Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > 2nd Amendment and Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-21-2008, 12:11 AM
echo_5
Guest
 
Angry +1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock Fan View Post
I understand that Glock pistols are used by at least 80% of the law enforcement market. I can imagine the impact if they took a similar position. Would be very interesting to say the least. :)

It's been an uphill battle so far, but I think Ronnie Barrett's efforts are beginning to pay off. Barrett rifles have stopped selling or servicing any LEO agency in CA due to the ban of .50 BMG rifles by citizens. I respect companies that are willing to stand up to the government and protect our 2A rights.

I'm putting in an order for a STI Sentinel Premier on Tuesday. ;)



gf
Glock is a HUGE supplier to the LE community. I pray that they will also stop servicing CA agencies. California's extensive approval process is, in my opinion, meant to dissuade gun manufacturers from exporting firearms to CA, a backdoor attempt at gun banning. This follows a certain company's attempt to serialize casings/projectiles. As we say here in New England "I'm wicked pissed."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association