Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > 2nd Amendment and Politics


Vermont stole my idea...

and I'm glad they did. I posted this idea last year in a few places, never dreaming it might come ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1  
Old 10-19-2009, 04:33 PM
OldOwl's Avatar  

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Near Boston
Posts: 191
Default Vermont stole my idea...

and I'm glad they did. I posted this idea last year in a few places, never dreaming it might come to fruition. My other idea which went with it was to make people who create "Gun free zones" buy liability insurance for it.

Here's what I just got in an email, and I haven't confirmed it, but I like it.


.................................................. ......................................


> Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the
> U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very
> carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping
> some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.
>
> Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and
> require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would
> become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going
> about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning
> a gun.
>
> Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only
> affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a
> clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was
> advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a
> "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals.
>
> Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a
> right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and
> those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms"
> shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack,
> Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that
> they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."
>
> Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be
> required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and
> driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate
> government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state
> should they be asked to do so," Maslack says.
>
> Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the
> least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state
> that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.
> This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has
> resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.
>
> "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the
> system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
>
> This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to
> pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own
> guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.
__________________
"The ways of the world are created by two groups of people; those with entrusted power who desire wealth, and those with entrusted wealth who desire power." ~ Wayne L. Harvey 2007
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 10-19-2009, 05:19 PM
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 299
Default

Great post Old Owl! Thank you. Even if it doesn't get any traction in VT, it will surley raise the hackles of the anti-gun crowd.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2009, 05:32 PM
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 130
Default

Wow! 50 states should implement this!
__________________
Our founding fathers knew that if the only guys with the guns, are the bad guys. WE'RE SCREWED! ~ Wayne Lapierre
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2009, 05:37 PM
dendrokeeper's Avatar  

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 72
Default

and double the fee for politicians who own guns and want to take them away from the public.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2009, 06:38 PM
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dendrokeeper View Post
and double the fee for politicians who own guns and want to take them away from the public.
+100
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2009, 06:42 PM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Thank God I'm alive!
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,994
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

On a more serious note, though, just like the rights of gun owners should be respected, so too should the rights of people who choose not to keep and bear arms.
__________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:02 PM
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 24
Default

Is there an amendment for the right to not keep and bear arms?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2009, 09:40 PM
OldOwl's Avatar  

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Near Boston
Posts: 191
Default

I sent a letter to my state rep tonight telling him this is a great idea to raise revenue since we are broke here in assachusetts. Our idiot governor (a friend of Obama) saw we were having a shortfall in tax revenue last year, so he RAISED taxes. How stupid is that? so now, a year later he decides to FINALLY cut services. I know this won't fly in the progressive state but I'm still going to rub their noses in it and see if GOAL might get behind this idea.

I see my rep in person about once a month and he said he "Likes to hear from his constituents," so, he's hearing from me.

Here's a little more on it, there's a good amount if you google it, AND this includes the rest of my thoughts about the gun free zone.

Calcasieu Constitutionalists: Register Non-Gun Owners
__________________
"The ways of the world are created by two groups of people; those with entrusted power who desire wealth, and those with entrusted wealth who desire power." ~ Wayne L. Harvey 2007
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2009, 04:04 PM
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 633
Default

Great post!
__________________
"Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
idea, stole, vermont

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/2nd-amendment-politics/10009-vermont-stole-my-idea.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Wow, Vermont finally got something right! - Page 2 - DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum This thread Refback 10-21-2009 11:08 PM 5




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association