The right to keep and bear arms in Nevada

[Bohemian]

Is it possible that Nevada legislators who claim to support the Second Amendment actually oppose it? When one looks at state laws and the Nevada Constitution, it becomes apparent that either state legislators have never understood the intent of the Second Amendment, or they are in fact hostile toward it.The historical record surrounding the Second Amendment is clear. The Framers included the right to keep and bear arms for one reason: self-defense against tyrannical government...

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents," wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 28, "there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. ... The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms. ..." ...

The right to keep and bear arms in Nevada: Part I
Lawmakers seem eager to misunderstand the Second Amendment
Nevada Policy Research Institute

The right to keep and bear arms in Nevada: Part II
The state’s unconstitutional gun laws
Nevada Policy Research Institute