Soldier balks at deploying; says Obama isn’t president

capo2186 · #11 07-16-2009, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by festus

TREASON...the act of overthroughing a govt. by means of deception and sedition carries a stiff penalty. The last time someone caused grave damage to the USA like that they were executed.

Maybe I am confused...but I thought the PEOPLE have the right to overthrow their goverment when that goverment is not in their best intrest. So if it is treason to try and over throw the goverment, doesn't that mean we don't have that right anymore?

-Confused

HootmonSccy · #12 07-16-2009, 09:20 AM

Subj: Retired Marine Judge Accepts Obama Birth Certificate Case

BORN IN THE USA?
Eligibility arguments to get court hearing
'For 1st time, we have a judge who's listening'

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: July 13, 2009
9:52 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

In what ultimately could prove to be a turning point in the legal challenges to Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, a federal judge in California has planned a hearing on the merits of a federal court case raising those questions.

According to attorney Orly Taitz, who is working on multiple cases alleging Obama is a "usurper" because he doesn't meet the constitutional requirement that only a "natural born citizen" can be president, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled in a hearing today that her case will move forward.

The hearing was on her motion for a default order against Obama, because although Taitz said she notified him of the action, Obama's attorneys did not make an appearance.

Her complaint was filed against the president on Jan. 20, the day of his inauguration, over his actions before he became president.

Taitz has told WND if her motion for default is granted she immediately would request access to Obama's birth records and other documentation that could determine his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

"I have a very clear case," Taitz said. "I think they dropped the ball. They didn't figure out this case filed on Jan. 20th, on the day of inauguration.

The case was filed on behalf of former U.S. Ambassador Alan Keyes, also a contestant in the 2008 presidential race in California, and others. Taitz said the case might have been confused with another Keyes vs. Obama case filed in the state's court system, which was thrown out and now is on appeal.

"I will be asking for the release of his vital records," she has told WND.

The case, which also includes Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson as plaintiffs, names as defendant "Barack H Obama also known as Barack Hussein Obama II also known as Barack H Obama II also known as Barry Obama also known as Barry Soetoro."

The judge said as a former Marine he recognizes the importance of having a constitutionally qualified president.

While no attorneys appeared on Obama's behalf, several members of the U.S. Attorney's office in California were in attendance, and sought to intervene on behalf of Obama over his actions before becoming president.

The judge ordered them to accept service of the lawsuit immediately and then continued the case to an unannounced date.

Taitz told WND, "For first time, we have a judge who's listening."

capo2186 · #13 07-16-2009, 09:28 AM

WOW things are going to get very interesting.

Tex4oc · #14 07-16-2009, 10:18 AM

I don't know how it would work. Pelosi is in line, but since she was appointed by obama, his appointment would no longer stand, and SHE was the one who wrote to ALL the states AG's vetting him in the first place.
That makes her a conspirator in the fraudulent election and subject to prosecution. Any lawyers here want to post a theory?