Go Back   USA Carry > Subject Specific > LEO Encounters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-14-2008, 03:53 PM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Gun Lover
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,255
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

Pardon my French, but you gotta be shittin' me! Why should the manner in which a knife is opened determine whether or not it is legal? Then again, the term "switchblade," much like the term "assault rifle," sounds like some semantic wordplay that was developed by antis to make them seem worse than they really are, in order to get them outlawed.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:02 AM
abock33's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norhtern, KY
Posts: 96
Default Aparently they have tried...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock Fan View Post
Kershaw should nail them for discrimination. They're specifically targeting Kershaw"s product.




gf


So I emailed Kershaw and they've said that the NPS has been doing this and that they've tried to get them to change the sign.

May be "we" need to do something.


From............:
Email...........:
Phone...........:
Urgency.........: Normal
Subject.......: Undefined (Kershaw)
------------------------------------------------------------
To Whom it may concern:
My name is , I am writing to inform you that your knives are being descriminated against at our national monuments.
I own a few of your "assisted opening" type knives that I love. I recently took a trip to the Arch In St. Louis. Not thinking that a 2 1/2 inch pocket knife would be a problem at a national monument I took along my Scallion. As it turns out the national park service consider ALL your knives to be switchblades. There is a sign on the door that describes "illegal" knives, such as switchblades, butterfly knives, knives with blades over 4 in, and KERSHAW knives. It doesn't mention any other brands that have "assisted Opening" only Kershaw. I understand about the others but to single out only one brand of knife is crazy in my mind. Needless to say I didn't enter the arch.
Someone needs to inform them that there are other manufactures out there with the same style of knives and to change the sign to more general wording. I guess I figgure that the National Pars service would rather hear about it from a company suck as yourselves rather than a regular ol Joe like myself. I will alyways carry my kershaw and nothing will change that.



Kershaw Knife‏
From: Jeff Goddard (Jeff@Kai-USA.Com)
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as unsafe
Sent: Mon 7/14/08 2:48 PM
To:

Mr. ,



Yes we are aware of this sign. It has been going on for several years now.

We have tried and tried to contest this with no luck. I cannot even get a response from them. They are not worried about knives in general, just with speed of opening, I guess there is an intent to kill.

Silly.

We have had people get tickets. Some have paid. Others have not and have asked for a court hearing, which they will not grant. It is basically like a parking ticket I have been told.



Actually it may be better from you, since you said that you did not enter because of this. I would love to be able to educate them on the fact that others make assisted knives.





Jeff Goddard

Director of Sales & Marketing-Sport Division

Kai USA, Ltd.

Kershaw Knives, ZT Knives, Shun Cutlery

18600 SW Teton Ave

Tualatin, OR 97062

503-682-1966

503-682-7168fx

jeff@kai-usa.com NEW EMAIL ADDRESS
__________________
America: Home of the Free because of the Brave!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-16-2008, 05:37 AM
Glock Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,227
Default

I wouldn't waste my effort writing to the government agency. If Kersha was serious about fighting the feds, they would have done something already.

Be careful on educating the government. Doing so may lead to future restrictions.



gf
__________________
A few well placed shots with a .22LR is a lot better than a bunch of solid misses with a .44 mag!


Glock 19 9mm
Glock 23 .40 S&W
Glock 27 (x3) .40 S&W
STI Edge .45 ACP
Taurus 66SS .357 Mag.
Mossberg 500 12 Gauge
Remington 860 20 Gauge
Remington 700 .308 Win.
Ruger 77 .270 Win.

Glock Armorer
NRA Pistol
NRA Rifle Instructor
NRA Home Firearm Safety Instructor
NRA Member
IALEFI Member

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-10-2008, 09:11 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Euless, Texas
Posts: 8
Default My Take On It

Here's what I think about this can carry, can't carry, state parks, federal this and federal that, state this and state that BS..............A law abiding American citizen with a license to CARRY should be allowed in ALL states and ALL PLACES and also on domestic airline flights, ON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOIL. PERIOD.............................No ands, ifs, or buts about it
__________________
You bet your ass I carry cocked and locked
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:00 AM
LongRider's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Skokomish Rez
Posts: 63
Default

IMO any ban on any weapon is a violation of 2A but last time I checked my opinion is irrelevant
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShanghaiKid View Post
A law abiding American citizen with a license to CARRY should be allowed in ALL states and ALL PLACES and also on domestic airline flights, ON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOIL. PERIOD.............................No ands, ifs, or buts about it
IMO the unconstitutional ban on weapons on planes is what made 9/11 possible. Gun control, Weapon control AKA Anti Self Defense laws aid and abet terrorists, rapists, thieves, robbers murders and criminals of all kinds. Not one has ever benefited a single law abiding citizens. They have never ever stopped a single crime. Not once. The only verifiable consequence of any of these laws is that they get the law abiding raped robbed assaulted murdered and terrorized
__________________
Those who would, deny, require permit, qualification, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family

Last edited by LongRider; 09-12-2008 at 04:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-12-2008, 12:34 PM
PascalFleischman's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock Fan View Post
If they're going to make laws, rules, etc., they should have logical reasoning behind them.



gf
Then there wouldn't be any "common sense" or "reasonable" gun restrictions!

Why this law? Because it makes people FEEEEL good....
__________________
Victory rewards not the army that fires the most rounds, but who is the more accurate shot.

---Unknown

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
arch, bad, ccw, louis, time

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association