
Originally Posted by
HootmonSccy
I think the writer's opinion is valid, but is also from a law enforcement officers view point.
I would never want my local policeperson carrying a .380 as their service weapon.
However, their job, and why I carry is possibly different. They are likely to have to shoot at a suspect at a greater distance and they may be behind a barrier of some type (Car door, wall, etc).
MY job carrying concealed is to stop a threat that is directly in front of me, in most cases..
It is hard to believe that a .380 did not enter a skull at point blank range.. Could it happen, sure.. but unlikely in most cases.. There have been people hit with a .45 multiple times, and still live.
His point about the sights, etc again are not that important to me as a concealed carry person.. YES, I need to be able to hit what I'm shooting at when I shoot. Again, I'm shooting at a body size object 10-15 feet away from me.. IF I can't hit that without using my sights, I probably shouldn't be carrying.. I'm not shooting long distances and I'm aiming at center mass, not someone's foot.
I personally carry a 9mm, but I would carry a .380 and my wife does carry a .380.. Again, it is to STOP A THREAT, if the BG lives, so be it, so long as the threat is stopped..
I'm sure others will disagree, but most people I've talked (typed) with that disagree have a "Combat" mentality.. That's fine for them.. I don't live in Iraq, or Afghanistan and I'm not a paid mercenary.. I am a concealed carrying citizen out to protect myself and my family, If it has "good" stopping power (this is where the opinion comes in), works reliably, can be concealed well.. Then it's good to go.. a .380 is my minimum..