The Sig Sauer P239 (original) and CZ 2075 BD are very similar in specifications and features. If you had to choose one or the other for a CCW--with cost not a consideration--which one would you select and why?
Sig P239..........CZ 2075 RAMI
LOA 6.6....................6.5
HGT 5.1...................4.7
WDTH 1.2...................1.3
WGHT 29.5 oz............ 22-25 oz
BAR 3.6...................3.0
CAP 8+1................10+1
DCKR Yes................. Yes
N. SIGHTS Yes................. Yes
Last edited by carnesee; 01-11-2011 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Need Spacing
| | ![]() |
I carry a P239, and have fired it numerous times at the range. I've fired a limited number of handguns, but once I fired my first Sig (M11/P226) for the military, I instantly fell in love with it. Sigs are very ergonomic, balanced, and reliable. I can get a tight grouping with all 9 rounds in quick succession, where as the other handguns I've fired had more of a learning curve.
If you have the opportunity to fire them both before buying, then definitely do that. Sigs are right for me, but they may not be for you. The only way to find out is to try them both out and make your own decision.