
Originally Posted by
Trolljegeren
I do not drink, however, I fail to see how someone drinking has lost his right to self defense? The same applies to pain medications.
In my state you car carry a gun as long as you are able to drive legally.
Those who oppose beer and guns ought to think what the Second Amendment means.
Those who support an alcohol/guns mix ought to take the blinders off and think about what the constitution means as a whole.
A "No Drinking While Carrying" law does not hinder somebody's 2A right in the least. Not even the tiniest bit. It give somebody a choice. You can have one or the other, just not both at the same time. Such laws simply mean that if you choose to drink alcohol you are temporarily surrendering your right to carry. "Choose" being the key word there - it's up to you as an individual. You don't have to if you don't want to. It's no different than if you choose to walk out of the house today w/o a gun. Drinking alcohol is not a right, it's a highly regulated priviledge that has strings attached to it. This is one of those strings.
It's no different from a law that forbids convicted felons from carrying. It's no different from a law that forbids a person from carrying on a plane or on private property when the owner says "no". Don't like being in those situations?? Then choose not to put yourself in one.
(Insert random tough-guy quote here)
"See my gun?? Aren't you impressed?" - Anonymous sheepdog
Guns - the alternative to running for your life.