Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 135
Like Tree43Likes

Thread: House considers bill for for all states to recognize your home state permit

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    260

    Default House considers bill for for all states to recognize your home state permit

    It was a article I saw on the fox news website today. It said there is a large support for it on both parties. Had anyone else seen or heard anymore about this.





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    45

    Default

    I think at this point it is a hollow gesture to gear up for the 2012 elections. There is bipartisan support, maybe even enough to pass, but not even close to veto override support. There is no way that Obama signs this bill, and without enough support to override his veto why bother now.

    I would rather them wait and see what happens in 2012 so they don't offer the excuse that they tried but it didn't work.

    I hope my gut feeling is wrong, but I'm not holding my breath.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    582

    Default

    They are always going to put strings on it. There will be some compromise on something somewhere. I don't trust anything the thieves say they are wanting to do. Call me cynical if you want.

    Psalm 82:3-5

  5. #4
    RJ_Whitlock's Avatar
    RJ_Whitlock is offline M&P 9mm
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    239

    Default

    Good in theory but will be bad in execution.
    Sic vis pacem, para bellum

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Rome, NY
    Posts
    381

    Default

    The initial reaction of mine was positive, but then after thinking about it, this bill has the same problems that a Federal CCW has. The Feds gain control over what was a state's decision. What would happen to Vermont that has no restriction other than that it is illegal to possess/carry a gun with the intent to commit a crime?

    It's just to dangerous to let the Feds stick its nose under the tent! Look at drivers' licenses. There is recognition of all state to state, but the Feds dictate many state provisions of licensing.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimPage View Post
    The initial reaction of mine was positive, but then after thinking about it, this bill has the same problems that a Federal CCW has. The Feds gain control over what was a state's decision. What would happen to Vermont that has no restriction other than that it is illegal to possess/carry a gun with the intent to commit a crime?

    It's just to dangerous to let the Feds stick its nose under the tent! Look at drivers' licenses. There is recognition of all state to state, but the Feds dictate many state provisions of licensing.
    Exactly...seems hard to imagine going to this from a solid state's rights position. If this can be mandated at the national level, then was other elements of it will be mandated as well.
    "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
    Bertrand Russell

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    9

    Default

    No thanks. I agree with the other posters that the feds will just screw it up. I'm pretty happy with Michigan's system and the reciprocity that is in place, and I think that will get better. Let's keep the CCW/RKBA movement grass roots.

  9. #8
    cmhbob's Avatar
    cmhbob is offline Sig fault.
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma, for now
    Posts
    344

    Default

    Eugene Volokh talks about the hearing.hearings here: http://volokh.com/2011/09/14/congressional-hearing-on-interstate-handgun-carry-reciprocity/

  10. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,748

    Default

    I am against any bill that violate the 10th amendment
    I am against any bill that does not apply equally to all 50 states
    I am against the Feds getting involved in gun control
    I am against H.R. 822 and have been since it was introcuced and all other
    attempts at this same BS legislation

    I am not happy with the state laws of most states but I would rather
    put up with them than anything that comes out of Washington.

    If you are in favor of this bill then you are either anti gun rights or a
    hypocrite.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Initially, when I first read about this bill, I was in favor, but after reading posts and other member's thoughts and facts, I am actually against this now simply because I do NOT like the fact that the Feds will then be in control.

    What we have currently, is not a perfect system, but it works to a point and until something better can be proposed, I think I'll gladly stick with our current system!

Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

Facebook Comments


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •