Concealed carry is bulletproof
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Concealed carry is bulletproof

This is a discussion on Concealed carry is bulletproof within the Concealed Carry Discussion forums, part of the Main Category category; Facts are clear, concealed carry laws necessary to allow citizens to protect themselves. The courts have deliberated over the Second ...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    2,750

    Default Concealed carry is bulletproof

    Facts are clear, concealed carry laws necessary to allow citizens to protect themselves.

    The courts have deliberated over the Second Amendment for some time and it has been confirmed that individual gun ownership rights are indeed provided for in the amendment. Americans' right to own firearms is no longer in question. Today, the bigger issue is what to make of concealed carry laws.

    In the U.S., only Illinois, Wisconsin and Washington, D.C., don't allow any type of concealed carry. Every other state has joined the majority faction after seeing the benefits that can come from allowing citizens to lawfully carry firearms.

    Concealed carry laws prove their worth all the time, such as when citizens defend themselves from criminals. Just January, in Houston, two citizens used their legally concealed weapons to defend their office against a would-be attacker. Similar situations occur all the time that serve to further justify concealed carry laws.

    One flawed argument against concealed carry laws is that while they allow citizens to carry weapons, they allow criminals to do so as well. This theory falls flat on its face for several reasons.

    First of all, an extensive background check is required to get a concealed carry permit. Secondly, criminals who intend to break the law with a firearm aren't going to bother with a permit. Law-abiding citizens are the ones who legally acquire a concealed carry permit.

    A study by criminologists Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz estimated that firearms are used for self-defense 2.5 million times every year. In the 1980s, the U.S. Justice Department funded a study by the Social and Demographic Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts. In this study, 1,874 convicted felons from 10 states were interviewed.

    The results were astonishing.

    According to the study, 34 percent of the criminal respondents said they had been scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed citizen, and 40 percent said they had been deterred from committing a particular crime because they believed the potential victim was armed. If anything, this study seems to admit that it's safe to say armed citizens scare criminals and deter crime.

    Concealed carry laws shouldn't face any danger of repeal. Washington, D.C., famous for its stringent gun laws and lack of a concealed carry law, serves as a perfect case. According to the Federal Bureau of

    Investigation, D.C. had the highest murder rate and violent crime in the country from 2006 to 2007, far exceeding any other area. It still has one of the highest crime rates in the nation, despite infringing on its citizens' gun rights.

    Oddly enough, Vermont, which lies in the same region, is a complete opposite. It has the most liberal concealed carry policy in the country (along with Alaska), and one of the lowest violent crime and murder rates. It would seem that concealed carry laws save lives and protect law-abiding citizens in this case, as well.

    If nothing else, people have a right to defend themselves. U.S. police agencies are effective and wonderful at their jobs, but stretched thin in many areas. Officers can't be everywhere they are needed at once, especially in large metropolitan areas.

    From a strictly legal standpoint, concealed carry makes even more sense, as the government doesn't have a legal duty to protect its citizens. In 1982, a federal court of appeals ruled in Bowers v. DeVito that, "[T]here is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen." If citizens don't have the right to be protected, they at least deserve the right to protect themselves.

    Thus closes the bulletproof case for concealed carry laws.

    By: Travis Holland
    Source: The Batt


    Memberships: NRA, GOA, USCCA
    Guns: Glock 26, Ruger LCP, Beretta 90-Two .40, Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact 9MM, Beretta Tomcat, Bushmaster Patrolman M4

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Tacoma,WA.
    Posts
    95

    Default

    I agree with you, but the people in charge these days do not seem to care about our right to bear arms.
    They feel more comfortable, when we have no guns,that way they will feel free to pass what ever laws they
    want, without fear of us Americans being able to do anything about it,just like Hitler did !!!!

    Well, that's how I feel,anyways.

    Steve

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Deltona FL
    Posts
    455

    Default

    Nothing...NOTHING allows criminals to carry concealed weapons. I'd love to see statistics that showed that every crime committed with a gun was committed by someone who was carrying legally. The LAW makes it illegal for anyone not licensed to carry a gun concealed (with the exception to a state like Vermont which is a totally open state to begin with).

    So the answer is simple. The laws already exist to punish those who commit crimes, with or without a gun. And there are extreme penalties for those who commit crimes using a gun.

    Enforce the laws! Case closed!
    -= Piece Corps =-

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Rome, NY
    Posts
    653

    Default

    PeaceCorps: Even in Vermont legal guns are not used in crime. It is against the law to possess a firearm with the intent to commit a crime in Vermont.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spf159753 View Post
    I agree with you, but the people in charge these days do not seem to care about our right to bear arms.
    They feel more comfortable, when we have no guns,that way they will feel free to pass what ever laws they
    want, without fear of us Americans being able to do anything about it,just like Hitler did !!!!

    Well, that's how I feel,anyways.

    Steve
    Well, that didn't take very long - just the first reply.

    Godwin's law

    "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nogods View Post
    Well, that didn't take very long - just the first reply.

    Godwin's law

    "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
    And for good reason.. They/He are shining examples of how the desires of a few can destroy the lives of many. A government that restricts the use of arms by its citizens should not be tolerated or trusted... Hence the intended protection (not granting) of that basic God Given Right that was afforded by the 2nd Amendment...
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  7. #7
    hatchet19 is offline hatchet19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 6shootercarry View Post
    And for good reason.. They/He are shining examples of how the desires of a few can destroy the lives of many. A government that restricts the use of arms by its citizens should not be tolerated or trusted... Hence the intended protection (not granting) of that basic God Given Right that was afforded by the 2nd Amendment...
    Well, I was with you all the way up to the point where you said "God Given Right". I know what you mean, but this has nothing to do with God and everything to do with the U.S. Constitution. I agree with the article written by Travis Holland and support my law makers at the Local, State and Federal level by voting accordingly. In my opinion, it's the best legal way to effect change in the Government. Always Vote and always be an informed voter.
    hatchet

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    OHIO
    Posts
    1,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatchet19 View Post
    Well, I was with you all the way up to the point where you said "God Given Right". I know what you mean, but this has nothing to do with God and everything to do with the U.S. Constitution. I agree with the article written by Travis Holland and support my law makers at the Local, State and Federal level by voting accordingly. In my opinion, it's the best legal way to effect change in the Government. Always Vote and always be an informed voter.
    hatchet

    God had lots to do with it...... The US was founded on Christian principals, do your research.....

    Voting got us where we are today, didn't work very well, did it?
    Leave me alone... and I will leave you alone....
    Don't poke a wolverine with a sharp stick unless you want your balls ripped off.
    Don't start nuthin, wont be nuthin..... (and dont wear pink panties on my property)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Creswell, Oregon
    Posts
    3,548

    Default

    A government that has nothing to fear from it's citizens is a government out of control.
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatchet19 View Post
    Well, I was with you all the way up to the point where you said "God Given Right". I know what you mean, but this has nothing to do with God and everything to do with the U.S. Constitution. I agree with the article written by Travis Holland and support my law makers at the Local, State and Federal level by voting accordingly. In my opinion, it's the best legal way to effect change in the Government. Always Vote and always be an informed voter.
    hatchet
    While this passage may not refer to a gun, I believe that the meaning is the same.

    Luke 22:36 (King James Version)

    36Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.
    Exercising my right to own and arm bears

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •