Go Back   USA Carry > Subject Specific > Deadly Force and The Law

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:49 PM
GHF GHF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 18
Default Tueller Drill

Commit this to memory, and repeat to the LEO upon arrival:

A weapon within 21 feet poses a potentially lethal threat.

The "Tueller Drill" is named after its developer, Sgt. Dennis Tueller of the Salt Lake City Police Department. Based on the results of his own experiments, he showed that pretty much anyone, regardless of age, weight or height, could physically close a distance of 21 feet (6 meters) in about 1.5 seconds. A person armed with a knife or club within 21 feet poses a potentially lethal threat.
__________________
Orlando, FL
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 03-30-2008, 12:18 AM
Fallguy's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Milan, TN (Formerly of Parsons, TN)
Posts: 78
Send a message via Yahoo to Fallguy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PascalFleischman View Post
GF, once in the presence of medical personnel, the police are legally barred from talking to you. I was told that the request for medical attention was just as much of a legal backup as a physical one.
Hmmm..that's interesting. I'm not saying whether it's true or not, but in my years as an emergency responder (EMS, FD and Rescue Squad at different times) I've seen many a person questioned as they were being treated, even while in the back of the ambulance at times.

I now work at an Army Ammunition plant, it was just after 9-11 so had MP's on the grounds in addition to the Security Guards. A couple of teens had an accident on the highway that runs through the arsenal, they were questioned by the Security Guards, the MPs, the Sheriff's Dept, an MP who was a State Trooper in civilian life and then the State Trooper on duty for that area that night. The paramedic I was working with just about had to run them out of the back of the ambulance so we could leave.
__________________
“Because when seconds count, the police are only minutes away”

Posting in …….
OpenCarry.org
USA Carry
Glock Talk
Tennessee Gun Owners
also check
Handgunlaw.us
Tennessee Laws at: Michie’s Legal Resources
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2008, 02:18 PM
toreskha's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock Fan View Post
It depends on what you want the attorney for. If it's your every day "general" attorny that can do stuff like wills, business advice, etc, then check your yellow pages. If it's an attorney that will be specific to protecting your rights should you ever be arrested, then I'd consult with friends in the legal community, or check out the local courthouse. The better criminal attorneys will be in court for the bigger cases. They will be the ones you see on the news defending the "really bad" guys. Hourly rates will be kind of high, but you really can't put a price on your freedom. I'd set an appointment with the attorney and explain that you're a responsible firearms owner, and would like to have him/her on retainer. My criminal attorney is on retainer for $1,500. This will cover about 3 hours in court. The guy took my initial retainer and will bill me for the rest should the need arise.
If you can't afford retainer, try finding one who can give you a basic rundown of what to do (or more importantly, NOT to do) after an incident. For example, don't apologize or express feelings that what you did may have been the wrong thing...if such a statement is recorded, it may hurt you later. Choose the most complete way of telling the story, and stick with it - even if you're being completely honest, inconsistency or remembering things differently will be a problem. If you don't remember or aren't sure, just say so - but stick to not remembering or not being sure. Don't subscribe to anyone's suggestion on what may have happened.

Don't ever say, "Well, I'm not completely sure he was coming AT me" or "He sort of turned away just as a I pulled the trigger". No - he was charging like an enraged bull, you feared for your life, and defended yourself. Do not undercut your justification for your actions.

Also, at least in Florida, attorneys sometimes tell people not to say that they meant to "kill" their attacker or "shoot them dead", because that sounds like malice. Rather, the keyword is "stop" the suspect. You shoot them until they stop and fall, or stop the attack. If you kill them in the process, then that's just par for the course. If the attacker falls and loses their weapon, stop shooting - blood spatter will tell if you shot them while on the ground, and that can be bad for you.

Some attorneys also say (off the record) that it's best to put as many rounds into them as possible when you have the chance, as they're attacking. Killing them means that they won't make a statement, and there will either be no case at all, or you'll be much more likely to win.
__________________
"Clinging to guns and religion" sounds like a great idea to me! We should do that more often.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-11-2008, 04:20 PM
Glock Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toreskha View Post
If you can't afford retainer, try finding one who can give you a basic rundown of what to do (or more importantly, NOT to do) after an incident. For example, don't apologize or express feelings that what you did may have been the wrong thing...if such a statement is recorded, it may hurt you later. Choose the most complete way of telling the story, and stick with it - even if you're being completely honest, inconsistency or remembering things differently will be a problem. If you don't remember or aren't sure, just say so - but stick to not remembering or not being sure. Don't subscribe to anyone's suggestion on what may have happened.

Don't ever say, "Well, I'm not completely sure he was coming AT me" or "He sort of turned away just as a I pulled the trigger". No - he was charging like an enraged bull, you feared for your life, and defended yourself. Do not undercut your justification for your actions.

Also, at least in Florida, attorneys sometimes tell people not to say that they meant to "kill" their attacker or "shoot them dead", because that sounds like malice. Rather, the keyword is "stop" the suspect. You shoot them until they stop and fall, or stop the attack. If you kill them in the process, then that's just par for the course. If the attacker falls and loses their weapon, stop shooting - blood spatter will tell if you shot them while on the ground, and that can be bad for you.

Some attorneys also say (off the record) that it's best to put as many rounds into them as possible when you have the chance, as they're attacking. Killing them means that they won't make a statement, and there will either be no case at all, or you'll be much more likely to win.

+2 Excellent advice. Don't make any statements unless you have an attorney present. If you do choose to make a statement, make sure it's consistant.

LEO use the phrase "neutralize the threat". The goal is to get the BG to stop attacking. If it takes 5 rounds and ends up in someone in a body bag, then it is what it is.



gf
__________________
A few well placed shots with a .22LR is a lot better than a bunch of solid misses with a .44 mag!


Glock 19 9mm
Glock 23 .40 S&W
Glock 27 (x3) .40 S&W
STI Edge .45 ACP
Taurus 66SS .357 Mag.
Mossberg 500 12 Gauge
Remington 860 20 Gauge
Remington 700 .308 Win.
Ruger 77 .270 Win.

Glock Armorer
NRA Pistol
NRA Rifle Instructor
NRA Home Firearm Safety Instructor
NRA Member
IALEFI Member

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/deadly-force-law/1900-what-happens-after.html
Posted By For Type Date
Deadly Force and The Law - USA Carry Forums This thread Refback 05-19-2008 11:45 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association