|
#11
| |||
| | |||
| Commit this to memory, and repeat to the LEO upon arrival: A weapon within 21 feet poses a potentially lethal threat. The "Tueller Drill" is named after its developer, Sgt. Dennis Tueller of the Salt Lake City Police Department. Based on the results of his own experiments, he showed that pretty much anyone, regardless of age, weight or height, could physically close a distance of 21 feet (6 meters) in about 1.5 seconds. A person armed with a knife or club within 21 feet poses a potentially lethal threat.
__________________ Orlando, FL |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I now work at an Army Ammunition plant, it was just after 9-11 so had MP's on the grounds in addition to the Security Guards. A couple of teens had an accident on the highway that runs through the arsenal, they were questioned by the Security Guards, the MPs, the Sheriff's Dept, an MP who was a State Trooper in civilian life and then the State Trooper on duty for that area that night. The paramedic I was working with just about had to run them out of the back of the ambulance so we could leave.
__________________ “Because when seconds count, the police are only minutes away” Posting in ……. OpenCarry.org USA Carry Glock Talk Tennessee Gun Owners also check Handgunlaw.us Tennessee Laws at: Michie’s Legal Resources |
|
#13
| ||||
| | ||||
| Quote:
Don't ever say, "Well, I'm not completely sure he was coming AT me" or "He sort of turned away just as a I pulled the trigger". No - he was charging like an enraged bull, you feared for your life, and defended yourself. Do not undercut your justification for your actions. Also, at least in Florida, attorneys sometimes tell people not to say that they meant to "kill" their attacker or "shoot them dead", because that sounds like malice. Rather, the keyword is "stop" the suspect. You shoot them until they stop and fall, or stop the attack. If you kill them in the process, then that's just par for the course. If the attacker falls and loses their weapon, stop shooting - blood spatter will tell if you shot them while on the ground, and that can be bad for you. Some attorneys also say (off the record) that it's best to put as many rounds into them as possible when you have the chance, as they're attacking. Killing them means that they won't make a statement, and there will either be no case at all, or you'll be much more likely to win.
__________________ "Clinging to guns and religion" sounds like a great idea to me! We should do that more often. |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
+2 Excellent advice. Don't make any statements unless you have an attorney present. If you do choose to make a statement, make sure it's consistant. LEO use the phrase "neutralize the threat". The goal is to get the BG to stop attacking. If it takes 5 rounds and ends up in someone in a body bag, then it is what it is. gf
__________________ A few well placed shots with a .22LR is a lot better than a bunch of solid misses with a .44 mag! Glock 19 9mm Glock 23 .40 S&W Glock 27 (x3) .40 S&W STI Edge .45 ACP Taurus 66SS .357 Mag. Mossberg 500 12 Gauge Remington 860 20 Gauge Remington 700 .308 Win. Ruger 77 .270 Win. Glock Armorer NRA Pistol NRA Rifle Instructor NRA Home Firearm Safety Instructor NRA Member IALEFI Member ![]() |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/deadly-force-law/1900-what-happens-after.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Deadly Force and The Law - USA Carry Forums | This thread | Refback | 05-19-2008 11:45 AM | |