18Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
part two
This is a discussion on Judicious Use Of Deadly Force within the Deadly Force and The Law forums, part of the Main Category category; ...
Judicious Use Of Deadly Force gun control is being able to hit your target
part two
gun control is being able to hit your target
He is not very professional
“An armed society is a polite society.”
he didn't present as well as some others i heard and the presentation wasn't tight like i thought it might be but i learn a bit from everyone
gun control is being able to hit your target
When a speaker says "once a cock sucker always a cock sucker"
Need I say more?
“An armed society is a polite society.”
So you, who never served in the military or as a LEO are offended by this, to the point you throw his whole lecture under this judgement? You seem a bit sensitive.Originally Posted by Stan45
I have served in the military 12 yrs most of that was in Special Forces.
Later in life was in cop.
I'm not offended, if you could read I wrote "Not very professional."
“An armed society is a polite society.”
I trained under Mas at LFI. He is absolutely great.
Read "In The Gravest Extreme." It's an eye opener.
CERTIFICATIONS - NRA Pistol - NRA Refuse To Be A Victim - NRA Personal Protection In The Home - NRA Personal Protection Outside The Home - NRA Chief RSO - Tactical Handgun I & II - Urban Assault - Child Abduction Prevention - ISAFE - K9 Trainer
I will assume you're not a secret squirrel but are telling the truth and thank you for your service to our country.
Point 1. It is a mystery to me that one who spent time as a soldier AND as a cop could not see Mas as a product of his environment, with the use of vulgarisms, yet your initial post centered on this point as a summary of your opinion of the lecture.
Point 2. I don't know where he gave this lecture but in speech class I was taught to consider my audience. Who Mas was speaking to possibly affected how coarse he chose to be.
Point 3. To say Mas is an expert in the field is an understatement. Couple this with his prolific history in an area we all hold in high regard yields in us (I would assume) an automatic high respect.
I found offense in those certain words but as I consider the totality of who Mas is and what he is trying to accomplish "unprofessional" is not the impression I'm left with. That's why I wanted to know what you meant. Understanding the why is interesting to me, because there is always history behind a why. I assumed you have been in neither field because both are cultures in which vulgarity has such a presence that one reaches a point where it is hardly noticed anymore, yet that one phrase was your sum impression.
Posting Permissions