| ||||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack (3) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
| ||||
| ||||
| So I guess that the subject of this thread should be, "When is it legal to to point a firearm at someone?", since we all agree that "brandishing" is never legal, although pointing it to stop an attacker is.
__________________ Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. Benjamin Franklin |
|
#102
| ||||
| ||||
| I do like that question. Yet, because the definitions probably differ by state, maybe we could further ask what the laws are state by state? I believe that this was Ishi's original thought. Brandishing is not legal. Using a weapon in self defense is. The law in my state does not say that I have to pull a trigger, or fire, or throw or send a projectile outward. It might be legal to hold someone at gunpoint in Nevada, but not in Montana. (I'm just picking states out of the air, IDK for certain.)
__________________ The quest for the truth is always accompanied by skepticism of anyone claiming to have found it. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the WWW Last edited by gdcleanfun; 01-11-2009 at 10:13 PM. |
|
#103
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. Benjamin Franklin |
|
#104
| |||
| |||
| In CT it's the same idea. Basically, if you brandish, it better be in the defense of life. If you reasonably suspect that your life or the lives of others are in danger of death or serious injury you have the right to draw. I like the idea of "serious injury" because it leaves it open to different ideas. Maybe the guy had a bottle in his hand or a bat? It also states that the mere threat of serious harm is legally enough to detain the person using a reasonable amount of force. So if the guy says, "I'm gonna get my bat and kill you!" but doesn't even own a bat, you still have the right to draw right there and detain him until the police arrive. Maybe not such a great case to prove, but i'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by six. "I was in fear of my life" .......... A mantra a day will keep the lawyers away :) |
|
#105
| |||
| |||
| In a professional capacity i've had to draw my weapon several times (Security not a LEO) once was while off duty but on a property contracted by the company. I was on property speaking with a guard about their schedule (salary sucks)...anywho I heard shots and figured it was off property but checked anyway and called on duty staff over .well there it was in a populated metro city 2 men were shooting a rifle at cars passing on a very busy interstate. I was carrying and without thinking took them down at gun-point in plain clothes. I immediately called 9-1-1 and officers were there in about 10 minutes, by this time I had cleared the rifle- set it on top of my car, patted down the subjects and re-holstered my weapon. When PD Arrived I got plenty of thank you's and ego-boosters not a single comment about "brandishing". I don't know if this is because I was Security for the property and just off duty or if it was because I possibly stopped them from killing someone. I also received commendation from my employer and the Police Dept. In my experience the law varies from cop to cop, and if they don't write you a citation then you probably aren't going to be charged... (I am not a lawyer, don't listen to me)
__________________ REVOLUTION: Idea's spread they cannot stop them an idea who's time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government!- Ron Paul |
|
#106
| ||||
| ||||
| I've searched the Indiana Code website and can't find anything with the word "brandish" at all, so I tried various searches on "display firearm", "show firearm", "visible firearm", "see firearm", and still got nothing, so I just started searching more genericly on the terms firearm, gun, weapon, "deadly thing", and as far as I can tell, Indiana has absolutely no law regarding the display of a firearm, whether justifiably as in self-defense, or unlawfully, as in the commission of a crime. |
|
#107
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ |
|
#108
| ||||
| ||||
| Enjoyed reading this thread of posts --- 11 pages at this point. As many of you are probably well aware, many handgun owners are equipping their personal weapons with a trace laser. Many of these lasers are advertised as being a "deterrent" in and of themselves. Has anyone heard where a trace laser has been used **legally** and **effectively** in a self-defense situation? Isn't this brandishing, but at a higher level? Could this be considered assault in some states? |
|
#109
| ||||
| ||||
| In Oklahoma it is almost never ok to brandish. I have always been trained that if you feel the need to pull a weapon you need to take the shot. This does not include carrying at work, as I have had to brandish quite a few times on duty.
__________________ -Austin |
|
#110
| |||
| |||
| IMO this is a simple question. If you're going to draw on someone, you had better be planning on killing the BG. If, for some reason (we can't predict everything!) the BG sees you drawing and turns tail, you'd better be the first one calling the police to report the incident to avoid a brandishing charge. If the BG doesn't call, who knows who else witnessed the incident, or was caught on some surveillance camera, and might be making the call without the full story behind them. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| brandish, firearm, legal |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/deadly-force-law/307-when-legal-brandish-firearm.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| CCW guy's - Performance Boats Forums | This thread | Refback | 06-09-2008 10:53 AM | 1 |
| CCW guy's - Performance Boats Forums | This thread | Refback | 06-09-2008 01:36 AM | 1 |
| Deadly Force and The Law - USA Carry Forums | This thread | Refback | 05-28-2008 05:07 PM | 1 |