<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>USA Carry - Concealed Carry Forum - Texas Discussion and Firearm News</title>
		<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/</link>
		<description>Discuss anything related to Texas, laws, news, or anything members want to discuss with other local members.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:32:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>TX Concealed Carry Just Got Easier</title>
			<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/37068-tx-concealed-carry-just-got-easier.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[TX is changing the law (Subsections (a) and (h), Section 46.035, Penal Code) from the wording "fails to conceal" to the wording "intentionally...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start -->TX is changing the law (Subsections (a) and (h), Section 46.035, Penal Code) from the wording &quot;fails to conceal&quot; to the wording &quot;intentionally displays ... in plain view ...&quot; meaning it will not be illegal if the display is unintentional, (ie. printing?)<br />
This is SB299, originally HB1304. I believe the theory here is they are making it easier to carry concealed with less legal problems of absolute concealment, (THIS IS MY OPINION ONLY).<br />
Perry signed it, and it will be law 9/1/13.<br />
See all about it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=83R&amp;Bill=SB299" target="_blank">Texas Legislature Online - 83(R) History for SB 299</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/">Texas Discussion and Firearm News</category>
			<dc:creator>JSDinTexas</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/37068-tx-concealed-carry-just-got-easier.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Texas: State Senate Must Act on Campus Carry Reform Bill Today or Tomorro</title>
			<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/37058-texas-state-senate-must-act-campus-carry-reform-bill-today-tomorro.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*Texas: State Senate Must Act on Campus Carry Reform Bill Today or Tomorrow* 
 
Posted on May 20, 2013 
 
House Bill 972...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start --><b>Texas: State Senate Must Act on Campus Carry Reform Bill Today or Tomorrow</b><br />
<br />
<font color="#4A4A4A"><span style="font-family: arial"><i>Posted on May 20, 2013</i></span></font><br />
<font color="#4A4A4A"><span style="font-family: arial"><br />
</span></font><br />
<font color="#4A4A4A"><span style="font-family: arial"><a href="http://www.nramedia.org/t/1594164/72603220/21175/0/" target="_blank">House Bill 972</a>, an important <a href="http://membership.nrahq.org/default.asp?campaignid=XC025146" title="NRA" target="_blank">NRA</a>-backed self-defense bill that would repeal the criminal prohibition on the possession of firearms on college campuses by Texas Concealed Handgun Licensees (CHL), is still pending in the Texas Senate – where final action must be taken on the measure by <i><u>this Wednesday</u></i>.<br />
<br />
<b>Make no mistake: anti-gun Senators and gun control advocates are trying to run out the clock on this important reform bill, and it will die without a vote unless your state Senator hears from you TODAY!<br />
<br />
While HB 972 gives individual higher education institutions the authority to adopt administrative rules and regulations governing whether CHLs may carry into their buildings and facilities, we believe that by eliminating the criminal prohibition and granting schools immunity from liability, more colleges and universities will consider changing their restrictive policies to allow law-abiding adult CHLs to protect themselves on campus.<br />
<br />
This measure also requires an annual review of any restrictive policies, with input from law enforcement, students, faculty and staff. Additionally, it contains language preventing schools from adopting or enforcing policies which prohibit students with CHLs from transporting or storing handguns and handgun ammunition in their locked, private motor vehicles while driving through or parking on campus.<br />
<br />
<b>Please call AND e-mail your state Senator NOW and urge him or her to support HB 972, and to push for a Senate vote before Wednesday’s deadline. Contact information for your Senator can be found here:<br />
</b></b><a href="http://www.nraila.org/legislation/state-legislation/2013/5/texas-senate-must-act-on-campus-carry-reform-bill-today-or-tomorrow.aspx" target="_blank">NRA-ILA | Texas Senate Must Act on Campus Carry Reform Bill Today or Tomorrow</a><b><b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senate/Members.htm" target="_blank">The Texas State Senate: Current Members of the Texas Senate</a></b></b><br />
</span></font><!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/">Texas Discussion and Firearm News</category>
			<dc:creator>gejoslin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/37058-texas-state-senate-must-act-campus-carry-reform-bill-today-tomorro.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is the Austin Chief of Police a Gun Control Troll?</title>
			<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/37030-austin-chief-police-gun-control-troll.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*The lack of civility coming from gun control advocates was made apparent again over the weekend when Austin, Texas Police Chief Art Acevedo...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start --><b>The lack of civility coming from gun control advocates was made apparent again over the weekend when Austin, Texas Police Chief Art Acevedo described a pro-gun twitter user as having a &quot;lying extremist undeveloped brain.&quot;<br />
It seems the pro-gun tweet that drew Acevedo's ire was one that suggested the police chief supported universal background checks. Acevedo tried to undercut this claim by labeling it &quot;lying&quot; and &quot;extremist.&quot;<br />
<br />
However,  as Twitchy points out, Acevedo has been clear about his support for universal background checks in the past. <br />
<br />
In fact, during the May 19 exchange with the &quot;lying extremist&quot; pro-gun twitter user, Acevedo tweeted: &quot;police chiefs have supported UBC long before this POTUS &amp; will continue doing so long after he leaves office.&quot; <br />
<br />
In another tweet, Acevedo mocked concerns that universal background checks will curtail personal liberty and infringe on the the 2nd Amendment itself: &quot;Oh, no the horror, gun profiteers can't sell guns to criminals and nuts.&quot;<br />
<br />
These texts have since been deleted from Acevedo's twitter account in what appears to be an effort to cover his tracks. </b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/20/Austin-Police-Chief-Says-Gun-Rights-Supporter-Has-Lying-Extremist-Undeveloped-Brain" target="_blank">Austin Police Chief Trolls 2nd Amendment Supporter on Twitter</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/">Texas Discussion and Firearm News</category>
			<dc:creator>The_Outlaw</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/37030-austin-chief-police-gun-control-troll.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Here's the latest on Texas Bills:]]></title>
			<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/36869-here-s-latest-texas-bills.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 03:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Subject: Texas Pro-Second Amendment Bills 
  
Texas House Gives Final Approval to Impressive Number of Pro-Second Amendment Bills 
Gun owners’...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Subject: Texas Pro-Second Amendment Bills<br />
 <br />
Texas House Gives Final Approval to Impressive Number of Pro-Second Amendment Bills<br />
Gun owners’ patience and persistence was rewarded on Saturday and yesterday, as the Texas House of Representatives led by Speaker Joe Straus (R-San Antonio) gave approval to a wide range of pro-gun legislation while the <a href="http://membership.nrahq.org/default.asp?campaignid=XC025146" title="NRA" target="_blank">NRA</a> Annual Meeting was underway in Houston. Most of these bills passed overwhelmingly, in spite of repeated attempts by anti-gun members of the minority party to kill some of these measures by raising parliamentary “points of order” against them for alleged violations of House rules. Many violations are procedural in nature, involving the committee process and committee reports. Thanks to the meticulous work of House Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee Chairman Joe Pickett (D-El Paso) and his staff, none of the points were sustained, and debate and votes on the bills were allowed to proceed on the House floor. <br />
<br />
Thank you to the hard-working sponsors of these measures and their dedicated staff for getting them passed in the state House of Representatives<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Senate Bill 299 / House Bill 1304 </b>by state Senator Craig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) and state Representative Kenneth Sheets (R-Dallas) protects against charges of unlawful carry for the inadvertent or accidental display of a handgun by a Concealed Handgun Licensee. SB 299 was taken up in lieu of HB 1304 on the House floor and will be the bill that goes to Governor Perry for his signature.<br />
<br />
<b>Senate Bill 864 / House Bill 47</b> by state Senator Donna Campbell (R-New Braunfels) and state Representative Dan Flynn (R-Van) reduces the minimum number of required classroom training hours for original and renewal Concealed Handgun Licenses from 10-15 to 4-6. This change would make it far more convenient for CHL applicants to obtain a license to carry and exercise their right to self-defense. SB 864 was taken up in lieu of HB 47 on the House floor and will be the bill that goes to Governor Rick Perry for his signature.<br />
<br />
<b>House Bill 508</b> by state Representative Ryan Guillen (D-Rio Grande City) imposes civil fines on state agencies, cities or counties which improperly post 30.06 signs prohibiting Concealed Handgun Licensees from property which is not off-limits to them under the Texas Penal Code. It also gives the Texas Attorney General or local district attorney the ability to sue to collect the civil penalties if the offending agency or political subdivision fails to remove the sign after having been notified of a violation. This bill now moves to the Senate for consideration – please contact your state Senator and urge him or her to support HB 508! Contact information can be found by clicking here.<br />
 <br />
<b>House Bill 972</b> by state Representative Allen Fletcher (R-Cypress) and state Senator Brian Birdwell (R-Granbury) eliminates the criminal prohibition on the possession of firearms on public and private college campuses for Texas Concealed Handgun Licensees. As passed in the House, schools may adopt administrative rules and regulations restricting licensees in campus buildings, but only after consulting annually with campus law enforcement, faculty, staff and students. HB 972 also now contains language from SB 1907 by Senator Glenn Hegar prohibiting public and private institutions of higher education from adopting or enforcing policies banning students who are CHLs from transporting and storing handguns and ammunition in their privately-owned motor vehicles while driving through or parking on campus. This bill now moves to the Senate for consideration – please contact your state Senator and urge him or her to support HB 972! Contact information can be found by clicking here.<br />
 <br />
The following pro-Second Amendment bills were also passed in the Texas House and now go to the state Senate:<br />
<b>House Bill 48 </b>by state Representative Dan Flynn (R-Canton) and Senator Donna Campbell (R-San Antonio) streamlines the process for renewal of a Concealed Handgun License by eliminating the continuing education course and handgun proficiency demonstration requirements. Applicants would still be required to renew their licenses every five years, but they would be provided with an informational form regarding pertinent firearms and deadly force laws, which would have to be signed and turned in with the CHL renewal application. <br />
<br />
<b>House Bill 485 </b>by state Representative Sarah Davis (R-Houston) reduces the fees for original or renewal Concealed Handgun Licenses charged to veterans who are honorably discharged after at least one year of military service, as well as reserve and part-time peace officers, to $25 – from $70 to $35, respectively. A House floor amendment was adopted which included two new categories of individuals to whom this new discount would apply: TDCJ correctional officers and members of the Texas Military Forces. <br />
<br />
<b>House Bill 698</b> by state Representative Drew Springer (R-Muenster) and state Senator Craig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) requires DPS to establish procedures for the submission of fingerprints by CHL applicants who live in counties with populations of less than 46,000 and do not live within 25 miles of a designated facility capable of processing them digitally or electronically. Availability of such services continues to be a problem in rural areas, as the state only contracts with one company. <br />
<b><br />
House Bill 1076</b> by state Representative Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands) would prohibit any state agency or agency employee from enforcing a federal statute or regulation on firearms or firearm accessories that does not exist under Texas state law. Any agency that violated this prohibition would not be allowed to receive state grant funds for the fiscal year in which a violation occurred.<br />
 <br />
<b>House Bill 1349</b> by state Representative Lyle Larson (R-San Antonio) prohibits DPS from requesting or requiring that an applicant’s social security number be disclosed during the process of obtaining an original or renewal Concealed Handgun License.<br />
 <br />
<b>House Bill 1421</b> by state Representative Charles Perry (R-Lubbock) and SenatorCraig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) would allow firearms seized by law enforcement in connection with a crime, and not returnable to a rightful owner, to be sold at a public sale to federal firearms licensed dealers rather than be destroyed.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/">Texas Discussion and Firearm News</category>
			<dc:creator>UATKP</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/36869-here-s-latest-texas-bills.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Well, What happened?.</title>
			<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/36824-well-what-happened.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Can anyone decipher the news stories on what happened in the State Legislature, as far as firearms laws are concerned?   
I can't make heads or tails...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Can anyone decipher the news stories on what happened in the State Legislature, as far as firearms laws are concerned?  <br />
I can't make heads or tails out of it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/">Texas Discussion and Firearm News</category>
			<dc:creator>UATKP</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/36824-well-what-happened.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Texas 'Cronyism' Steals Citizen's Land via 'Eminent Domain' guise.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/36822-texas-cronyism-steals-citizen-s-land-via-eminent-domain-guise.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*Breitbart News has learned of a broad-ranging, long-term property seizure scheme in Texas’ Tarrant County Regional Water District, in which District...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start --><b>Breitbart News has learned of a broad-ranging, long-term property seizure scheme in Texas’ Tarrant County Regional Water District, in which District employees have abused eminent domain privileges, forced homeowners and businesses off their properties, and awarded no-bid contacts via secret meetings that are never reported to the public.</b><br />
<br />
See the full story....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/07/Exposed-Texas-Cronyism-and-Secret-Meetings-Steal-Citizen-s-Land-Via-Eminent-Domain" target="_blank">Exposed: Texas Cronyism and Secret Meetings Steal Citizen's Land Via Eminent Domain</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/">Texas Discussion and Firearm News</category>
			<dc:creator>The_Outlaw</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.usacarry.com/forums/texas-discussion-firearm-news/36822-texas-cronyism-steals-citizen-s-land-via-eminent-domain-guise.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
