
Originally Posted by
G50AE
Actually the main issue was that he was tried by a bad judge. Yes this was a gun case. And yes the gun laws in NJ are horrible. But they main issue this case shows is the need to get rid of bad judges.
A repeal of the exemption for judicial officers in 42 USC 1983 would be a great start. Why shouldn't they be liable for "mistakes" they make? This only leads to corruption.

Originally Posted by
ccwnj
the lawmakers in nj only believe the 2a applies to citizens in the home behind closed doors.....they also believe scotus didnt define to keep n bear in a way that nj should feel compelled to change any gun law in place ...the attorney general stated that nj has carefully crafted the gun laws so the constitution has no influence or bearing on matters of a citizens 2a right outside the home...the AG also states they do issue ccw's, but you must have a justifiable need for it....the ccw law in place does not define what that is and or leaves the decision to issue, open to opinion of a county judge, and its always their opinion you dont need it....so they dont issue ccw's...
The NJ lawmakers are gonna try to twist anything if it goes against the anit-gun agenda. Some look at the 2A and say, "Well it doesn't say where you can carry, so we can regulate"....NO!! FAIL!!
It doesn't list where you can carry because you are supposed to be able to carry anywhere you can go. Now even though it's unconstitutional to make exemptions for court rooms and detention centers, even being a die hard supporter of the Constitution, I will relent.
BUT AN ENTIRE STATE?!! Completely moronic to get people to swallow that logic and obviously tied to ulterior motives.
So you guys in NJ, this is YOUR baby. Things there will never change if you don't get different people into the legislative branch in your state. Form organizations, track what they are doing, how they vote, inform other people in your state, this stuff takes diligence. Moving away is NOT the answer, that's the mentality that has our country flooded with thousands of illegals from Mexico, because it was easier to move than it was to fix things where they were at.
How do you think that an unknown (Rand Paul) was elected for the US Senate over a favored candidate that has been our AG for a long time with many political ties? Rand wasn't even a representative, he was a dentist. Mitch favored Rand's opponent for election, BUT WE STILL GOT HIM ELECTED BY A LANDSLIDE!
The power lies in the people, but not if you don't exercise that power.
One must be wary of the mentality creating the problem or the law creating the crime.
I love America and the Constitution, if you don't then get out!