NBC caught in journalistic lies and fraud in the Martin-Zimmerman case - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
Like Tree14Likes

NBC caught in journalistic lies and fraud in the Martin-Zimmerman case

This is a discussion on NBC caught in journalistic lies and fraud in the Martin-Zimmerman case within the Firearm Politics & 2nd Amendment Issues forums, part of the Main Category category; Originally Posted by SWATPrez I doubt Hannity has a CCW, Beck either for that matter, ... You would be wrong. ...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Carolina USA
    Posts
    1,329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SWATPrez View Post
    I doubt Hannity has a CCW, Beck either for that matter, ...
    You would be wrong. Sean Hannity has talked at length about having a CC permit, shooting & SD. Glenn Beck has also discussed his need to get his CC permit because of all the REAL death threats he has received from the LOONS on the left.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2

    Default

    NBC makes me sad.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,569

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thistle172 View Post
    Where's the link pointing at whatever stupid thing NBC allegedly did?

    BTW: NO news organization is credible.
    It's the blue link in the post titled "contact the board of directors"
    "Those who would trade liberty for security, deserves neither liberty nor security."
    "The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson".

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,569

    Default

    Just curious but can anyone bring a timeline to fruition when it was media became so biased and stopped reporting news factually? It seems to me it was during the Clinton regime when the progressive left started gaining momentum. Possibly it was sooner than that but I am not sure.
    "Those who would trade liberty for security, deserves neither liberty nor security."
    "The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson".

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    DFW Area, Texas
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blogengeezer View Post
    As this 'hysterical outrage' according to national media theatrics, was fanned into a Race baiting issue, Hillary Clinton quietly signed the UN 'SMALL ARMS BAN", Barack Obama, on 16 March 2012, quietly signed a revolutionary sweeping Executive Order, mandating (unprecedented in relative peacetime) 'Martial Law' Powers to himself (to the extent that Congress ...'some Conservative members'... are now even concerned.) Add to that, Homeland Security 'open end' Ordered 450,000,000 rounds of Ammo,including HPs,.... for 'target practice'?

    RE: Clinton signing a treaty, this is a hoax that has been circulating for the last two years. I was unable to find any legitimate news source stating that this treaty was signed in March of 2012. However, even if she were to sign such a treaty, it would not circumvent the Constitution. More can be found here: snopes.com: Small Arms Treaty

    RE: Obama granting himself martial law authority; apparently that can't be done so easily either.

    The National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order is real and was signed by President Obama on March 16, 2012. It updates the policies set down by an Executive Order that was signed on June 3, 1994 by President Bill Clinton. According to the text, the Executive Order "delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950." It does not appear to institute martial law but speculators are raising doubts. The entire text of the Executive Order can be read on the White House website. Click for text.

    There is a provision at of the end the Executive Order that may be interpreted as a clause that would prevent the Executive Branch, or any agency, from usurping the law:

    Sec. 804. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    updated 03/19/12

    See the whole article here: President Obama Signed an Executive Order That Grants the President Power to Institute Martial Law- Fiction!
    Carpe Nox!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    150

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Truth is truth..... its our responsibility to weed out truth from individual perspective. We have the ability to discern the difference, but it takes effort, and many aren't willing to invest, imho.

  8. #18
    SR40c's Avatar
    SR40c is offline Done told her once...
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    2,072

  9. #19
    CathyInBlue's Avatar
    CathyInBlue is offline Tool Maker
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    991

    Default

    In related news, Al Gore's Current TV is in danger of missing minimum audience viewership to remain on Time Warner Cable systems. I guess it's just no fun being a Leftist TV network these days.
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Saginaw, Michigan
    Posts
    2,049

    Default

    Sorry... those sources you posted.. and thank you for providing your sources.. are nothing more than wailing and gnashing of teeth... with precious little actual facts about the incident itself.

    You see... it doesn't matter if the assailant is Mother Teresa right up to the point where she attacked... the attack makes her wrong and makes her the assailant.

    It also doesn't matter if the defender is a serial killer right up to the point where he is attacked... the attack makes him the defender and it is correct for him to defend himself.

    Now... what does matter is...

    Who did the attacking? Zimmerman or Martin?

    All else is just folks choosing sides and coming up with justifications to support their choice.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •