Amend/Repeal Class III Ban - A Stepping Stone To Total Gun Confiscation - Page 3

View Poll Results: Do you support the amendment/repeal of the 1986 Class III Weapons Ban?

Voters
214. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes it is clearly a constitutional infringement and a Inalienable right.

    161 75.23%
  • Yes it is clearly a constitutional infringement.

    55 25.70%
  • No, only law enforcement and military should have Class III Weapons.

    3 1.40%
  • No, only law enforcement and military should have Class III or any kind of Weapons.

    1 0.47%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 161
Like Tree1Likes

Amend/Repeal Class III Ban - A Stepping Stone To Total Gun Confiscation

This is a discussion on Amend/Repeal Class III Ban - A Stepping Stone To Total Gun Confiscation within the Firearm Politics & 2nd Amendment Issues forums, part of the Main Category category; Why is the NRA and Goa not pounding this into our heads. Jews PFO is on it and calls the ...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,913

    Default

    Why is the NRA and Goa not pounding this into our heads. Jews PFO is on it and calls the NRA friends of the ATFE. The only thing the government has to fear from armed citizens is government coruptionnot being stooped.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    3,089

    Default

    Now that the supreme court has ruled that banning an entire class of weapons is unconstitutional I think it is high time that we reminded the NRA, the GOA and SAF about their broken promises in this regard...

    Please review the first post in this thread to see how this 11th hour back door infringement occurred...

    take action...

    and vote in the poll at the original post if you have not already...

    AND BLOG THIS THREAD, SPREAD THE WORD!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Inland Empire
    Posts
    394

    Cool Wait a day and there wil B PLENTY 2 have everywhere!

    Civil law fails, what AR/NG's we have stateside R quickly dropped by snipers sporting M1's to Baretts's. Move B 4 the 'nasty' gets into your hood & find a place to lay low, I mean stealth, with your survival gear, and shooters, and some trusted armed M8's who R good at 1,000 meter one-shot kills. Amerca is full of recreational hunters! B-come one with a thick dense forest or find a cave. Then just go out recce when the shootng stops @ night and U will find every full auto-shooter in the inventory on every dead ex-owner, plus oodles of ammo, grenades, mines, gas-masks, U name it all for free! Original owners won't B needing them anymore, U sure will be. So why wait for laws to change or if they do go spend thousands on an MP-5, M60, SAW, M16, M203's or whatever U want, when there will be plenty around after the SHTF. From loaclized civil unrest to nationwide organized revolt. Logical thinking in a post lawful world/U.S./States where a weapon that shoots 600rpm is a friend not a trophy. Untll then one good shot with an old bolt-action Lee-Enfield .303 in a good cammo-ed spot (overwatch) can do as much damage in a well planned ambush as a patrol of armed goons all bunched up and walking down an open road at high noon, shooting full-auto at shadows or decoys or until their mags run out. 1 by 1 they drop c/o single kill-shots out of the lethal range of most M16's and all pistols. 5 like minded shooters, 5 spotters, 3-5 to keep command + control ='s a hunter-killer platoon of militia, with decent hunting rifles have (and still do in places like Columbia) taken out an entire infantry Bn of tired conscripts or tired volunteers, or sent the surviors running away in disorganized panic. Ask any good 60 y/o VC retired warrior w/ a few notches on his AK-47!, or a 20 y/o muj sniper/spotter 2-man team today in B-Dad, not like they will stick around to chat. They use Mech, U use LAW's 'n Dagons or TOW's to counter, they use air, U pop-smoke, di-di and resuface when you find some SAM kit or M2's. If we ever become the innocent targets/victims of those who get paid to protect us (cops or military), AND if we have commited no crimes, we cail this the right of self-defence, something like a bunch of gosh-darn very troublesome colonist rebels did around 1770. Still a touchy subject not fully covered in most British history books I ever read :-)

    Canis-Lupus
    Last edited by Canis-Lupus; 06-27-2008 at 09:11 PM. Reason: The Art of War ref chpts.

  4. #24
    toreskha's Avatar
    toreskha is offline Titles are un-American.
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,437

    Default

    It is a God-given right, or if you don't believe in God, then it's our right by virtue of being human. No one in their right mind can deny the right of self-defense to any living being, much less a human being. Even housecats will fight back if cornered by a grizzly bear.

    In any case, the type of weapons banned are rarely used in actual crimes, and the people that own them are usually really tight about keeping them away from those that might misuse them. I fail to see the potential problem here with respect to public safety.
    Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    3,089

    Thumbs up

    The Unabridged Second Amendment

    "If we do nothing, we can only say we did nothing" ... George Washington

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Battle Creek Mi
    Posts
    1,853

    Default

    Although class III weapons are legal her in Michigan, who can afford one, and a repeal of the 86 bill would help bring the price of them down sufficiently that you could buy a nice NIB full auto in 9 for a couple of K or less and not the oft heavly used for a significantly higher number that they are now.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    3,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheldon View Post
    Although class III weapons are legal her in Michigan, who can afford one, and a repeal of the 86 bill would help bring the price of them down sufficiently that you could buy a nice NIB full auto in 9 for a couple of K or less and not the oft heavily used for a significantly higher number that they are now.
    Yes, good point, New M-16/M-4 Full-Auto - two thousand or less, post May 19th, 1986...
    Used M-16/M-4 Pre-Ban, Pre May 19th, 1986 Twenty thousand...

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    bouncing between CA and NV
    Posts
    186

    Default

    FYI.

    Class 3 refers to Special Occupational Tax (SOT).

    There are no Class 3 firearms.

    Title 1 = non-NFA firearms (handguns, rifles, shotguns)
    Title 2 = NFA firearms (AOW, SBR, SBS, MG)

    A Type 08-FFL Class 1 SOT allows you to import NFA firearms.
    A Type 07-FFL Class 2 SOT allows you to manufacture NFA firearms.
    A Type 01-FFL Class 3 SOT allows you to deal in NFA firearms.

    Common mistake is to refer to Title 2 NFA firearms as Class 3, because you have to go to a Type 01-FFL Class 3 SOT dealer in order to buy a Title 2 NFA firearm.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    3,089

    Default

    FYI:

    Class III Weapons is the most common way full auto's are referred to by laymen...

    Firearms (Modern) > Class III / NFA / Destructive Devices:
    GunBroker.com: Guns (Modern) : Class III / NFA / Destructive Devices

    Show me Everything in > Firearms : Class III:
    Firearms : Class III

    NFA et.al.:
    National Firearms Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Form 4:
    http://www.atf.treas.gov/forms/pdfs/f53204.pdf

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,913

    Default

    I don't care what the goans call them I want one but would never get one with out premit.

Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •