Next Wave of Gun/Ammo Regulation
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree14Likes
  • 7 Post By MI .45
  • 2 Post By Finlander
  • 1 Post By bigrebnc1861
  • 4 Post By Gen John Hausken

Next Wave of Gun/Ammo Regulation

This is a discussion on Next Wave of Gun/Ammo Regulation within the Firearm Politics & 2nd Amendment Issues forums, part of the Main Category category; One of the few USSC justices that most of thought was on our side now appears to be co-opted: Scalia: ...

  1. #1
    MI .45's Avatar
    MI .45 is online now MI .45
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    560

    Default Next Wave of Gun/Ammo Regulation

    One of the few USSC justices that most of thought was on our side now appears to be co-opted:

    Scalia: Guns May be Regulated - John Aloysius Farrell - NationalJournal.com

    Is everyone going to the dark side? Read between the lines here folks... this is an opening salvo and it won't take but one more incident such as Aurora to push more stringent gun regulation to the forefront. Libtards, hoplophobes, and the ignorant will be crying out for the omniscient government to "do something" which will result in a quick, ever expanding, and draconian revocation of our right to have, use, and carry firearms. Watch their words... then their deeds!
    “You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you mad.” – Aldous Huxley

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Extra ammuition was the 1st thing I bought after that sh..heads shooting spree. All the weapons in the country are usless without ammo.

  3. #3
    bigrebnc1861 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Posts
    1,088

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MI .45 View Post
    One of the few USSC justices that most of thought was on our side now appears to be co-opted:

    Scalia: Guns May be Regulated - John Aloysius Farrell - NationalJournal.com

    Is everyone going to the dark side? Read between the lines here folks... this is an opening salvo and it won't take but one more incident such as Aurora to push more stringent gun regulation to the forefront. Libtards, hoplophobes, and the ignorant will be crying out for the omniscient government to "do something" which will result in a quick, ever expanding, and draconian revocation of our right to have, use, and carry firearms. Watch their words... then their deeds!
    Yes I am reading between the lines

    Republican president. "Of course I would not like to be replaced by somebody who sets out immediately to undo" what he has spent decades trying to achieve, the justice said.
    A justice is not supposed to achieve anything he is supposed to be neutral and sticking within the confines of the Constitution and the laws. To rule on the Constitutionality of legislation made by Congress and to be part of the checks and balances of the Federal Government.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    26

    Default

    More gun Control will just make crimes more fatal when they do happen, because the only ones who will have guns, are the "hell bent" criminals. And THEY will be shooting out of anger, and revenge. just Like the foreign Terrorists. They won't just be crazies out trying to imitate some movie Character.
    So I would suggest, to any judge who tries to tighten Gun control, to make sure you have the means to protect your citizens, if You're not going to let them protect themselves. as it stands, CCW is the only protection we've got. And that's a stretch against someone with an AK-47, or the like. because when seconds count...The cops are only minutes away!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •