Will The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban be Reinstated?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Like Tree15Likes

Will The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban be Reinstated?

This is a discussion on Will The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban be Reinstated? within the Firearm Politics & 2nd Amendment Issues forums, part of the Main Category category; by CTD Suzanne On September 4, 2012, the Democrats released their official platform on gun control, stating that they fully ...

  1. #1
    mmckee1952 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,388

    Default Will The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban be Reinstated?

    by CTD Suzanne
    On September 4, 2012, the Democrats released their official platform on gun control, stating that they fully support reinstating the assault weapons ban. Just a few months prior to this, President Obama, while speaking in New Orleans, said that he believes “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals—that they belong on the battlefields of war and not on the streets of our cities.” It has been eight years since the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban expired. If President Obama serves another term, will he stand by his party’s position?


    Banned because they look ominous.
    The Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 (AWB) was part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act signed by President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1994. It expired 10 years later due to a sunset clause. There have been numerous, but failed attempts of reinstatement since then.

    The term “assault weapon” has been in use by journalists since 1943. In the newspapers, writers would call all kinds of things assault weapons, including major league baseball players’ baseball bats. It wasn’t until the early 1980s that the media described military-looking semi-automatic rifles as “assault weapons.” The phrase started to become popular with those pushing for stricter gun control. In 1985, Newsweek ran a story about semi-automatic rifles titled “Machine Gun U.S.A.” In the story, they refer to semi-automatic rifles as “assault weapons” and “military-style weapons.”

    The Brady Campaign, then called Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI), originally focused on getting handguns banned, saying that handguns were "made to kill people.” The HCI said, “Criminals don’t use longer-barreled weapons…” Failing at the attempt to ban handguns, the organization switched their tune to getting semi-automatic rifles banned. Their original chorus proved to be true. In studies done about the effectiveness of the ban, experts agreed that the results of the ban were so insignificant there was nothing to report.

    Clearly, the media and gun control advocates were trying to confuse an uninformed public about what exactly a semi automatic and a fully automatic were. Gun control advocates simply assigned the phrase “assault weapon” to guns they felt held certain aesthetic features. It did not matter whether or not the gun was a single-shot, full-auto, or semi-auto. New Jersey State Attorney General made a prime example of this when he called the Marlin 60 a “people killing machine.”

    A real assault weapon is a gun used in the military that can fire fully automatic. However, Senator Dianne Feinstein, author of the AWB, HCI, and other anti-gun people and organizations used the term to describe anything that even remotely looked like a military-style weapon. Senator Howard Metzenbaum even described them as “ominous.” Therefore, any gun that looked scary they deemed an “assault weapon.” The ban says, “…having features that appear useful in military and criminal applications.”

    The ban outlawed magazines that held more than 10 rounds, 19 specific guns such as UZI and the Tec-9, accessories and attachments. Guns could only have one accessory or attachment. Rifles could only have one of the following attachments: an adjustable stock, pistol grip, bayonet mount, grenade launcher, or a flash suppressor. Handguns could not have threaded barrels, a barrel shroud that worked as a “hand hold,” and had to weigh at least 50 ounces unloaded. Shotguns could hold no more than five rounds, could not have an adjustable stock, or a pistol grip. Guns manufactured before the ban were grandfathered in. Of course, the assault weapons ban did nothing to change how the guns function or fired. It was purely a symbolic gesture of power.


    Senator Dianne Feinstein said these weapons are not for hunting deer they're for hunting people.
    Essentially the ban raised demand for military-style rifles that were in compliance with the new law and it increased gun prices. What the ban did not do, however, was change crime rates anywhere. Before the assault weapons ban, only two percent of the guns used in crimes were the banned types. In fact, one study found “…working purely at the firing rate and power of the firearms included under the AWB, the 19 banned weapons are less dangerous than many weapons left untouched by the ban.” Even Feinstein admitted that nothing had changed, “Semi-automatic assault weapons are turning American’s streets into war zones. True, they are not responsible for a large number of homicides…” Before, during, and after the assault weapons ban, our streets have never been a war zone.

    People are still confused because the media continues to use the term “assault weapon” in reference to any black rifle or AK-47. The guns used in recent crimes are not fully automatic machine guns. In 1995, 240,000 machine guns were registered with the ATF and since 1934, only two legally owned machine guns have been used in a homicide. A police officer, using his issued weapon, committed one of those homicides.

    Dianne Feinstein is running for re-election this year and says she will reintroduce the assault weapons ban. Unfortunately, another ban would not be unconstitutional. In the District of Columbia v. Heller, the ruling does not protect all guns under the 2nd Amendment. If President Obama is reelected, an assault weapons ban is highly possible. What do you think? Tell me about it in the comment section.

  2. #2
    jd_mitchell's Avatar
    jd_mitchell is offline Proud Eagle Scout
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Palisade, Co
    Posts
    54

    Default Will The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban be Reinstated?

    With all the paranoia involved with guns in general, it wouldn't surprise me

  3. #3
    mmckee1952 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,388

    Default

    Senator Dianne Feinstein is fighting for her political life, she walked off an News interview this week because she didn't like the question, well Boo Hoo Hoo.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Scorpion Ranch
    Posts
    909

    Default

    Oh, my goodness, it shall be worse, it shall be "We know who you are and where you live, we gonna put yall in chains". They have been watching us since 1968. Been worried for years this is going to happen. I pray I am wrong but the Pres is following his buddy, Hitler, he has his base that are blind they just see this great liberal that is gonna get em pay back for the last 200 + years.
    22 As for the king's orders, we will not follow them: we shall not swerve from our own religion either to right or to left.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    145

    Default

    "Senator Dianne Feinstein said these weapons are not for hunting deer they're for hunting people." Wrong on both accounts. They are to remind people like her they work for us not us for them. Well, guess they can also be used for hunting deer.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    NE Mississippi
    Posts
    1,036

    Default

    The Clinton Assault Weapons Ban will never go away in the minds of liberals. So far in the last 3.5 years there have been three failed attempts (IMO) to take a back-door approach to reinstitute it. Dianne Feinstein is one of the few that are so vocal about it....being the Senator of Hollywood, San Fransisco, Monterey, Oakland, Berkley, etc, it is understandable. A much more telling person who was talking about it the day she entered the Senate was former Senator Hillary Clinton. Immediately after accepting Secretary of State, she started pushing for a treaty with Mexico that would outlaw the same guns that fell under the Clinton Ban. And we all know about the UN agreement.

    Congressional Democrats are all over the map about many issues. Gun control is one that nearly all of them agree with.

    As most Congressional Republicans are totally ignorant of firearms, they at best half-heartedly oppose it, others are neutral about it. I believe the only reason they allowed it to expire was a handful of Senators who pushed for it to appease the NRA lobbyists. To get the lobbyists out of their faces.
    "I don't think that a society that encourages over a million abortions a year....a society that kills out of convenience, i.e., Jack Kevorkian, can not have consequences." --Rush Limbaugh

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,228

    Default

    Stock up ladies and gentlemen.
    If it doesn't fit, FORCE it! If it breaks then it needed to be replaced anyway.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    910

    Default

    Well crime dropped to nothing last time it was in effect right? States like Mass, NY, NJ and CA have laws more imposing then the AWB and they have almost no crime at all right? States that have little or no laws about what one can own or the configuration thereof have the highest crime rates right? Thus the liberal mind facts and reality have no part in the decisions they make.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Scorpion Ranch
    Posts
    909

    Default

    The libtards are correct. Thar be no sproten purpose for a 100 round Klip. The 2nd Amend never was about deer hunting. It has been about the Hired Help in DC getting too big for thar pants. They have gathering the facts and the polling data on how many assault weapons kill.
    22 As for the king's orders, we will not follow them: we shall not swerve from our own religion either to right or to left.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    910

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NotTwoShure View Post
    Thar be no sproten purpose for a 100 round Klip.
    Half pirate and half public education? Also what is a 100 round Klip ( am guessing you ment CLIP ) in any case never seen one before. What firearm accepts a 100 round clip???

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •