Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Florida Politicians. Ya gotta wonder.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,224

    Exclamation Florida Politicians. Ya gotta wonder.

    Firing squads. Yup. This guy wants to use firing squads for capital punishment cases.

    I honestly don't know where I stand on this one.

    Comments?

    Florida Lawmaker Wants To Use Firing Squads For Convicted Murderers - Guns News and Guns Reviews at Guns.com
    To not stand against injustice is to stand for it.
    Don't confuse my personality and my attitude.
    My personality is who I am, my attitude depends on who you are.





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #2
    maybejim's Avatar
    maybejim is online now Maybejim
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Kalifornia & Idaho
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walt629 View Post
    Firing squads. Yup. This guy wants to use firing squads for capital punishment cases.

    I honestly don't know where I stand on this one.

    Comments?

    Florida Lawmaker Wants To Use Firing Squads For Convicted Murderers - Guns News and Guns Reviews at Guns.com
    Do you have to bring your own gun or do they supply one?
    Maybejim

    Life Member NRA
    Life Member CRPA
    Life Member SASS

    What you say isn't as important as what the other person hears

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    771

    Default

    My thoughts - if the method of execution is adjudicated to be "humane" (It either IS or ISN'T, no degrees.) then I think the choice comes down to what is best value for taxpayer money.

    Does it cost less to electrocute? Inject? Shoot? Or hang?

    As long as the method of execution is humane - ie a quick death that does not cause needless suffering or spectacle - then it doesn't really matter. The prisoner will be just as dead afterwards.
    S&W M&P 45; Ruger GP100 .357 Magnum; Charter Arms .38 Undercover
    http://www.usacarry.com/forums/members/phillip-gain-albums-phil-s-photos-picture3828-reciprocity-map-29jun11.JPG

  5. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Gulf Coast, Fl
    Posts
    1,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phillip Gain View Post
    My thoughts - if the method of execution is adjudicated to be "humane" (It either IS or ISN'T, no degrees.) then I think the choice comes down to what is best value for taxpayer money.

    Does it cost less to electrocute? Inject? Shoot? Or hang?

    As long as the method of execution is humane - ie a quick death that does not cause needless suffering or spectacle - then it doesn't really matter. The prisoner will be just as dead afterwards.
    You had to throw in that Spectacle, didn't you.. I was thinking a couple of BMG's might do the job quickly without suffering..

    Each of the methods costs something..
    I know in most states (that still have the choice) Electrocution is done OFF the grid.. They are done off Generator power.. So you have the cost of Generator maintenance, fuel, etc.

    Gulf Coast, Floriduh
    Sccy is the limit

  6. #5
    santa is offline santa
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    washington state
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Many many years in the past the debate was how to increase suffering during executions. Now we are concerned that it should be humane. I DO believe in the death penalty but count me as one of the people who say it should be carried out humanely. If carried out properly the gas chamber, electrocution, hanging, firing squad, lethal injection, all can be quick at ending life. The chief cost is not in the form the execution takes but in the years of legal wrangleing and the cost of the lawyers. But in the end dead is dead and the person executed will never ever commit any crime again.

  7. #6
    B2Tall's Avatar
    B2Tall is online now Stirrer of the Pot
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    1,630

    Default

    Firing squads as a means of lawful execution are generally reserved for more "honorable" foes. I wouldn't put murderous thugs or scheming killers in that group. The needle, rope, or chair should be used for them.
    (Insert random tough-guy quote here)
    "See my gun?? Aren't you impressed?" - Anonymous sheepdog
    Guns - the alternative to running for your life.

  8. #7
    G50AE is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,028

    Default

    How about that hanging machine used in the Clint Eastwood Classic, "Hang'em High"?


  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    St. Louis County, MO
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by B2Tall View Post
    Firing squads as a means of lawful execution are generally reserved for more "honorable" foes. I wouldn't put murderous thugs or scheming killers in that group. The needle, rope, or chair should be used for them.
    Or let them run loose and shot'em for "escaping custody"....
    (my keyboard typed this response mysteriously...)
    "Don't let the door hit ya where the dawg shudda bit ya!"
    G'day and Glock
    GATEWAY SWIFT WING ST. LOUIS

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    59

    Default Humane for who?

    I find the 'humane' debate interesting. Most people equate humane with how it looks to the on lookers. A firing squad would be very graphic to watch but is probably quicker and less painful than injection.
    Probably the quickest least painful method would be the guillotine, but death penalty opponents would decry it as inhumane because of the blood.

    On a side note, I fully believe in the death penalty, but I think we should give up on it. The process is too long and expensive. It would actually save money to keep these guys in prison for 40-50 years than to go through the appeals process that is currently required.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    624

    Default

    My understanding of how Utah did the firing squad was that there were multiple shooters with most firing blanks so there was no proof who fired the kill shot. With anti death penalty groups trying to interfere, like the medical groups that threaten the medical license of the person that oversees the lethal injection maybe the firing squad will be more efficient.

    I have an idea, make the execution the same method as the crime. Axe murders get the axe, gun crimes get shot, arsonists get burned, etc. maybe that would be more of a deterrent.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Facebook Comments


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •