Where did the article in the original post come from. I'd like to know the source, and by that I don't mean "Reuters". I would like to know where and by whom was it published.
| | ![]() |
Where did the article in the original post come from. I'd like to know the source, and by that I don't mean "Reuters". I would like to know where and by whom was it published.
Here's the link gang. Holy Cow.
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade | Reuters
God help us all... Scary to read...
Peace...
You can give peace a chance alright..
I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..
I'm glad I asked to see the original article. It has NOTHING to do with what was perpetrated in the original post from this thread. The proposed changes are for military arms deals and have nothing to do with US citizens purchasing guns for their personal use.
The original poster, "Vyrone", seems to have embellished the article quite a bit himself or at the very least given us something that somebody else has embellished. The Reuters article makes it very clear that this concerns government-to-government international arms deals.
Shame, shame. Let the socialists twist the facts and create panic out of nothing. We don't need members of this forum doing that here.
Could you provide a link to what was posted in the first post ?
"When a government robs Peter to pay Paul it will alway's have the support of Paul" George Bernard Shaw
... requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face
imprisonment.
Good luck. All the guns that the ATF has a 4473 with my name on it were stolen. Since they were uninsured, I didn't see any need to report the theft.
.