I'd keep the .45's and dump the .40's.
C'mon.....that's like trying to decide which of your kids to sell?? Keep 'em all!
(That is, of course, unless one of them is a real problem-child. If so get rid of that one)
(Insert random tough-guy quote here)
"See my gun?? Aren't you impressed?" - Anonymous sheepdog
Guns - the alternative to running for your life.
| | ![]() |
I'd keep the .45's and dump the .40's.
War to the Knife, Knife to the hilt.
If we don't want to live in a trashy area, we all have to be willing to help pick up the trash.
Drop 'em all and buy a Kimber and a Beretta or H&K.
Glad we could help with that. Whew... too much work!
![]()
Psalm 82:3-5
I say find a way to sell something else and keep them all.
I would sell the Glocks and keep the Sig.
I am Infantry, follow me!
1)"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." -Thomas Jefferson.
2)"Imagine how gun control might be stomped if GOA or SAF had the (compromising) NRA's 4 million members!" -Me. http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/nraletter.htm
I would drop the wife and keep the gun's. They are more dependable...But then again that's just me!
After owning or shooting other people's I have shot all the examples your talking about, I would keep the 23 first then the Sig, the subcompact's are great to conceal but are abit tough to shoot, a lot of muzzle flip, hard to do follow up shots, I will not get into the 40 vs 45 deal I have several examples of both, along with 9mm's and 380's and a couple of those NA 22 magnum's, and at the typical self defence range 15-20 ft I would NOT want to be shot with any of them