Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: Shot Spotter

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deserteagle:252859
    How do you guys feel about this gun shot surveillance system? Many cities pay 60,000 dollars a year per square mile for this. I have mixed feelings on it but Im leaning more towards thinking its unnecessary government surveillance and a waste of tax dollars. But Im not quite sure about it.

    Sniper Detectors Coming To America's Heartland | Fox News
    The city of aurora is getting these





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #12
    WB9IIE's Avatar
    WB9IIE is offline Master of Poverty Knob
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Soverign State of Poverty Knob near Tennessee
    Posts
    130

    Default

    The television series PERSON OF INTEREST, CBS, Thursdays at 9:00PM comes to mind with what is being discussed here. Who's to say it isn't already modified to snoop on people's private conversations?
    I don't carry a gun to kill someone. I carry a gun to avoid being a victim! Gary

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Cal-LEFT-fornia
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by the dark:253100
    I'm thinking the tech ended to pick up speech as opposed to a gun shot would be a lot more expensive. All the shot spotter needs to be looking for is a rapid spike in a Hugh decibel range.
    What exactly is the Hugh decibel range?

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Creswell, Oregon
    Posts
    1,596

    Default

    It's amazing cash straped cities can afford this system. Most are cutting public safety employees to save money. With the restritive gun laws in most large cities no one is aloud to own guns anyway. Why would there be a need.
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Summerville, SC
    Posts
    805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fuhr52 View Post
    It's amazing cash straped cities can afford this system. Most are cutting public safety employees to save money. With the restritive gun laws in most large cities no one is aloud to own guns anyway. Why would there be a need.
    Because when you're not allowed to own gun's, the BG's will still have them and they will be using them. And yes, I know I am just stating the obvious.

    KK

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Creswell, Oregon
    Posts
    1,596

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keykutter View Post
    Because when you're not allowed to own gun's, the BG's will still have them and they will be using them. And yes, I know I am just stating the obvious.

    KK
    You mean BG's don't obey the law? Who would have thought that? I'm shocked!
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  8. #17
    B2Tall's Avatar
    B2Tall is online now Stirrer of the Pot
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    1,630

    Default

    If they put a system like this in Detroit I think it would explode from overwork. D.C as well.
    (Insert random tough-guy quote here)
    "See my gun?? Aren't you impressed?" - Anonymous sheepdog
    Guns - the alternative to running for your life.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    mid MI
    Posts
    132

    Default

    I think they have 2 of them in Saginaw. I am a few miles away and shoot in my yard all the time.No police have ever showed up here for it. I dont think they work for for a wide area, just about a mile or so.imho I think it is way over priced for what it is supposed to do.
    WOODY!
    Please Bless and Support our Troops.
    Dont Blink, 100 Years Goes Faster Than You Think...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Facebook Comments


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •