Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Help with decision on 22 semi-auto pistol

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default Help with decision on 22 semi-auto pistol

    I realize that this topic has surfaced many times but I am currently trying to decide on 22 pistol for weekly target practice as a cheaper alternative to shooting 9mm and 45 cal. I have narrowed my choices to Browning Buck mark, Walther P22 and Colt 1911-22. Opinions/suggestions?





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Of those choices go for the Buckmark. Tons more aftermarket products, more accurate than the others. And get the Contour URX. More versatle. Has rails for mounting sights.

    Notice you didn't consider the Beretta Neos which has a much smaller grip. A lot of the lady shooter at my range really like it. Also the Ruger 22/45 which is has the grip and feel of a 1911, without the cost.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I have a buddy who loves the Ruger 22/45. It's the one he would pick over all the others he has if he had to chose only one.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    771

    Default

    I'd like to add my vote for the Ruger 22/45. $250-$300. Based on the rugged and time proven Mark Series of target pistols (MkI, MkII, and MkIII). I use it as the primary firearm for training my students in basic safety and marksmanship.
    S&W M&P 45; Ruger GP100 .357 Magnum; Charter Arms .38 Undercover
    http://www.usacarry.com/forums/members/phillip-gain-albums-phil-s-photos-picture3828-reciprocity-map-29jun11.JPG

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NH now, baby
    Posts
    137

    Default New Ruger too

    Ruger just announced the SR22 today.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    981

    Default

    Why haven't you considered the Ruger Mark II/III?
    "Those who would trade liberty for security, deserves neither liberty nor security."
    "The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson".

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Thanks for the opinions and suggestions. I have basically ruled out the Ruger Mark series because of the perceived difficulty with cleaning the gun. I go to the range weekly and thoroughly clean each gun after every outing. I am very intrigued with new Ruger 22. I own an LC9 and the new Ruger looks similar.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Thanks for comments. I have ruled out the Mark series because of the perceived difficulty with cleaning the gun. I go to range weekly and clean each gun thoroughly after each trip. I am very intrigued by the new Ruger 22 primarily because it appears to look similar to my LC9.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Missouri Blue Springs
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Madly LOVE my Ruger Mark III. But it is so accurate & easy 2 shoot that I like 2 make smiley faces with it. That being said you still have 2 shoot your carry gun 2 kee sharp with it.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    54

    Default

    Some people tend to knock the Buck Mark, but I love mine and I have had no trouble with it at all. I chose it over the Ruger Mark III due to the cleaning issuse, and the fact that (at the time) it cost quite a bit more than the Buck Mark. For the price of the Ruger I got the Buck Mark and a slightly used Kel-Tec P3AT pocket pistol (had wanted a pocket pistol for a while).
    .........................................
    NYMoose
    NRA, NYSRPA, GOA, USCCA

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Facebook Comments


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •