
Originally Posted by
NYMike
I have been following a lot of posts here in all categories for many months and finally decided to post some questions. I have determined based upon the remarks, questions, opinions, and attitudes I have read about and observed that very few folks here have had any real quality training at all, ever! I hope I am wrong but doubt it.
Imam talking about grainy lasting 4-5day at leat 10 hrs a day. On the order of GUNSITE, FRONTSIGHT, THUNDER RANCH, SEATTLE FIREARMS SCHOOL, US TRAINIG ACADEMY, LFI, etc... I may have left out a few, but u get the idea. Half of the classes are on the line and half in class rooms.
I base my thought on some of the remarks here. I have seen people state what sort of incident would provoke them into shooting at someone, and from my education prima facie it would seem not to qualify for self defense.
My question today is what factors on the surface do you readers believe would justify a self defence shooting. As a start I will hint in general you need at least 4 factors, possibly 3 minimum, but in rare circumstances. Usually all 4.
Let's see what our forum members come up with.
You kind of sound like an 'elitist' & quite possibly a troll to be quite honest. But okay, I'll bite.
I trained in Fort McClellan, Alabama's Military Police School (U.S. Army) And I graduated honorably in June 1992. I also have numerous years of additional training as a Military Police Officer with the California Army National Guard. I have since been Honorably Discharged.
I also have over 14 years of armed security Officer experience including 4 years of Federal Reserve Police Officer experience.
I have also been the victim of two different armed robbery's when I was younger at my uncles liquor store in Lake Elsinore, California. (I actually shot the guy in the second incident with my uncles Browning Hi Power 9mm ~Made in Belgium~).
I was only 17 years old at the time.
I also survived another robbery attempt one night at a drive thru ATM (4 guys) who blocked me in with 2 different cars. They took off like the rat cowards they are when they soon realized that I was prepared to use deadly force against them with my Ruger GP100 357 Magnum Revolver. (I was 28 years old in that incident).

Now I have some questions for you 'NYMike'...
What 'qualifications' and 'training' do YOU have?
And are you suggesting that a Law Abiding Citizen with less training than you or I should NOT be allowed to carry a concealed sidearm?? 
Let me guess, You probably agree with Mayor Bloomie's anti-gun stance also?
Are you 'one of those' cop's that believes that You are somehow better (more superior) than regular Law Abiding Citizens?
Are you one of those 'elitist types' who believes that 'only cops' should be allowed to legally carry handguns?
In my years of experience, I have unfortunately met a few cops with that 'elitist' mindset.
Don't get me wrong here, most cops are good & decent people. But there are always a few that have a superiority complex.
Is that you NYMike?
Correct me if I'm wrong...
MARK IT ZERO!
~Walter Sobchak~