So.......still think the mil is on your side huh?..........not

[lsmurphy]

A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”
The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”
The center — part of the institution where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday. It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”
The West Point center typically focuses reports on al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence.
But its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”

Read more: West Point center cites dangers of 'far right' in U.S. - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

[tricolordad]

Typically, throughout history, when a general oversteps the boundaries, bad things happen to him. Look at Rome.

[Dekul34]

Let's not forget west point weenies are not representative of the average guy they're going to try to have knocking down your door. In fact they need senate or vice presidential sponsorship to go there at all... Hmmm.

[nosreme]

..its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”...

It warns not about the far right but only about the much smaller subset of violent far righters (example: McVeigh). Not to do so would be irresponsible.

[lsmurphy]

It warns not about the far right but only about the much smaller subset of violent far righters (example: McVeigh). Not to do so would be irresponsible.

Dismissive and ignorant.

[Dekul34]

And who do you think they will call the violent far right when they come to take our guns and only receive our bullets... At muzzle velocity of course

[lsmurphy]

It warns not about the far right but only about the much smaller subset of violent far righters (example: McVeigh). Not to do so would be irresponsible.

Supporting gun-control is racist

Bookworm on Dec 19 2012 at 11:16 pm | Filed under: African-Americans, Second Amendment
In America today, especially in America’s media, the worst thing you can call someone is “racist.” In our Obama-era people who oppose Obama are racist; people who support the Constitution are racist; people who use the word “Chicago” are racist; people who comment about the president’s lean physique (unless they’re drooling female reporters) are racist; and –here’s the kicker — people who oppose gun control are racist.
Bookworm Room » Supporting gun-control is racist
.
Emerson, you are underwhelming.

[rich45r]

Hehe Dekul34, you're right about those weenies at West Point. Good job !!

[desertrat12]

A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”
The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”
[Which] ...lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”
The West Point center... but its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”

According to the Dept. of Homeland Security, anyone that is pro-2A, has or uses firearms, is a competitive shooter, a prepper, able to sustain themselves and family beyond 72 hours in an emergency, or is off grid in any way is part of the far right. The posts following the criteria issued by DHS are within this forum, I do not have the specific URL at hand, so no hyperlink. The Army is small potatoes compared to how many young elementary school minds are are being filled with revisionist _____. Think about it, for the Army, Navy, FBI, etc to turn out their grads, then get them assigned somewhere takes ~4-6 years, all it takes is ~2 years for elementary schools to mold your kids and neighbor's kids into walking 'anonymous reporters' for any infraction of proper social mores.

There are a lot of good folks that would balk at some possible orders and question their legality. The young mind that doesn't know better, and has right and wrong scrambled to fit a particular definition is the biggest threat in the shortest time. Think about it, read your kids text books and see how things have been switched or manipulated. Remember, these kids will be picking your nursing home or prison cell.

[Woody57]

It was my personal experience that once the "official business" was concluded and the assembly dismissed that reality sets in and people think for themselves. Even commanders sing a different song. More times than I can count I heard the commander say, "Now that I've given you the official word here's what we'll do." In the final analysis it would still be Americans turning their guns on fellow Americans and that's not likely.