Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: D.C.: Heller gets his permit

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    123

    Angry This was the part that left me scatching my head....

    Heller registered a revolver with the District on July 18. He also sought to register a semiautomatic .45-caliber Colt handgun, but that application was denied because police considered it a machine gun, the suit alleges. The suit says Heller could have been arrested had he taken his semiautomatic, which he stores in Virginia, to be registered at D.C. police headquarter.
    Just another bitter voter clinging to his guns and religion
    _________________________________________________
    Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #12
    tattedupboy's Avatar
    tattedupboy is offline Thank God I'm alive!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepWaters View Post
    Heller registered a revolver with the District on July 18. He also sought to register a semiautomatic .45-caliber Colt handgun, but that application was denied because police considered it a machine gun, the suit alleges. The suit says Heller could have been arrested had he taken his semiautomatic, which he stores in Virginia, to be registered at D.C. police headquarter.
    Thanks for the info. I had been wondering what happened with that.

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Logan
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Yeah and if I remember right, DC police consdider it a machine gun because it has "bottom fed magazines" and it is a semi-auto. The first time I heard this I could not stop laughing and I still can't. I've heard of twisting the rules, but give me a break. WOW!!!!


    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    ---Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

  5. #14
    tattedupboy's Avatar
    tattedupboy is offline Thank God I'm alive!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,159

    Default

    I'm just wondering how many more years and how many more lawsuits it will take to get D.C. to make D.C.'s gun laws "normal."

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    123

    Default

    I'm still trying to figure out how the Govt. lets them get away with making up their own rules and interpretations.
    Just another bitter voter clinging to his guns and religion
    _________________________________________________
    Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

  7. #16
    tattedupboy's Avatar
    tattedupboy is offline Thank God I'm alive!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepWaters View Post
    I'm still trying to figure out how the Govt. lets them get away with making up their own rules and interpretations.
    Here's why. The first time D.C. implemented the gun ban, it took 32 years to get it overturned. With the latest new set of draconian measures, it will probably take just as long to get those overturned. And after the next set of laws gets passed, the cycle will continue. Most of us will probably not even live to see D.C. gun laws restored to normalcy.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Facebook Comments


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •