Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > General Firearm Discussion


What Happens To You When You Buy A Gun?

Simply put the police are NOT protectors, they are investigators of crime after the fact. If you should be so ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-07-2009, 07:14 AM
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Carolina/Charleston
Posts: 139
Default

Simply put the police are NOT protectors, they are investigators of crime after the fact. If you should be so lucky they may be in the right place at the right time but it is incredibly dangerous for anyone to assume that will be the case.
Reply With Quote


  #12  
Old 08-13-2009, 01:55 PM
 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Castleton, NY
Posts: 36
Default

Thank you for posting that. I've sent it on to several other people.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-13-2009, 11:58 PM
6shootercarry's Avatar  

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 164
Default

Good way to look at it. Good read for those who do and those who don’t own / carry firearms. I have been very conscious of the change in the way that I feel with regards to the government. They are there for a reason and are needed, but not for handouts to the auto makers who have gotten themselves into the situation they are in. I don’t believe that they should be the financial life raft for business. The banks that are now more cautious with lending money are hurt because the government told them they can't refuse loans to those who may not qualify for them. Anyway my rant…. Law enforcement and those who have chosen to dedicate their life to it are to be commended for that choice. When the $#!% hits the fan we call them and they rush into danger... They can’t however be in all places at all times... This is the problem and has always been the problem. Now more than ever with federal and state budget cuts the police force most people depend on will shrink. In the harsh economic times ahead some people are going to choose crime as a means of survival. I live about an hour west of Boston and the police are pleading with people not to leave items in vehicles that will “cause people to break into their vehicles”… Gotta love that…
If I were to be violently assaulted and not armed, I would have to hope that I would survive the attack, hope that I could identify the offender, and then pray that when an officer was to arrest the suspect he/she remains calm, diligent, and crosses the T’s and dots I’s. If the suspect is then found guilty of the assault they will be remanded to the custody of the state. I don’t believe that they will be rehabilitated. The term closer to the truth is re-educated. I’ll explain. Once incarcerated the scared and often vulnerable offender will seek out those that will offer them protection. They will most likely find members of their own race. They will find members of a gang that will offer them refuge and safety for a price, servitude… They will be re-educated in the ways of crime. They will be made smarter criminals and better connected criminals. If and when they are released their servitude will continue out on the streets. And all of this re-education is at a cost to me the assaulted taxpayer. Now back to the beginning… If I was to be violently assaulted and I was armed I would have to make a decision to stop the assault. That does not mean that I would kill the assaulter, I would use deadly force if necessary to stop the assault. If their death is the result of my decision to defend myself, then that’s the result of a poor decision made by the assailant to assault me. I’m being responsible for my rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. Those who choose to take the protection of their lives as a responsibility should be commended as well..
Thoughts and opinions welcome…
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes". "Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants". -- Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by 6shootercarry; 08-14-2009 at 12:00 AM. Reason: fix spelling error
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-15-2009, 08:05 AM
vn6869's Avatar  

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: So Illinois
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kelcarry View Post
Simply put the police are NOT protectors, they are investigators of crime after the fact. If you should be so lucky they may be in the right place at the right time but it is incredibly dangerous for anyone to assume that will be the case.
Agreed, always wondered why police cars have "to serve and protect" when they have no obligation, much less history of protecting.

Realize it's dated, but am sending to my friends. Better late than never, or is that a police thing?

Actually do like police officers per se, just hate the liberals view that they are all the protection we need.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-15-2009, 08:12 AM
vn6869's Avatar  

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: So Illinois
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewaynelson View Post
Loved it! Especially the following excerpts...

There is a growing conviction that while our police system in this country is among the best in the world, it can't help you at the moment a crime is being committed: police are our avengers, not our protectors. The window to make that choice is closing, and since November 4th, many Americans have chosen to buy a firearm and ammunition and chose self reliance.

Many gun owners are more aware of the US Constitution than most non-gun owning folks—gun owners are more sensitive to liberty, where it comes from and how and when it is threatened. And, there is a growing impatience with a federal government that has overstepped its enumerated Constitutional powers.

Buying a gun is an outward sign of an awakening mind. God Bless America.


Good stuff! :)
I find the above highlighted statements rather fascinating, considering the current adminstrations latest actions to "take care" of us via the "health bill" and "bail outs" etc.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-22-2009, 07:56 PM
6shootercarry's Avatar  

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 164
Default

It all comes down to freedom. Some will choose to exercise their freedom and be responsible for it and some will choose to ignore the freedom they have, but then complain when it's taken away.. It's not for everyone to own a firearm this I believe, but it is for all to protect the rights we have been endowed with by the thoughts and actions of those who lived and died for the creation of this nation. Depending on others for protection has never been an option for me.
Unfortunately many people have come to look at the government as a means of survival.
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes". "Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants". -- Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by 6shootercarry; 08-24-2009 at 09:41 PM. Reason: blah blah blah
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
buy, gun

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association