| ||||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Littlejohn had been robbed three times prior to this incident — I wonder if the shotgun was a recent purchase? This seems a pretty open and shut case. I guess the only uncertainty is whether or not Elmore was responsible in any part for the prior three burglaries. If Elmore is found guilty, he should not only serve jail time, he should also be required to pay Littlejohn back for the expense of the shotgun shell used... as well as any damages done to Littlejohn's home. Additionally, he should be responsible for the cost of the life-flight, surgery and hospital bills.
__________________ Blessed be my God, my mountain, who trains me to fight fair and well! Psalm 144 (msg) ...follow me at twitter.com/matthewaynelson |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Well, I'm hoping Elmore will have some recovery time (which is a blessing for him, as he SHOULD be dead in two distinct halves) to reconsider his career choice. I'm sure the gov't has a position for a criminal with a history of stealing from the public.... ![]() Littlejohn should post that cool new sign, "Nothing inside is worth dying for" in front and behind his house...
__________________ "There is no consitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen." (7th Cir. 1982, Bowers v. DeVito) www.azsatt.com |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| He should have aimed a little more to the right. Would have saved a lot of money!
__________________ USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Life/Endowment To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787 |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| I guess Littlejohn finally decided that enough was enough and sure enough, the shotgun came in handy for him. By shooting Elmore, not only has he protected himself, but all the other people whose homes would have been burglarized had this not happened.
__________________ Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. Benjamin Franklin |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| HOLLY HILL – L. Glenn Littlejohn, 71, of 1244 Peake St. interrupted the suspect, Roosevelt Elmore Jr., at around 4:55 a.m. as Elmore stood in the doorway of Littlejohn’s home, according to police. Holly Hill Police Chief Robert Wunderlich said an unarmed Elmore allegedly forced his way though a doorway into the kitchen of the victim’s home. Littlejohn, after being awakened by home alarm, “grabbed his shotgun, went out the back door and went around to the side of the house where the suspect made entrance and confronted the suspect in the doorway,” Wunderlich said.... *** My concern is that Mr. Littlejohn went outside the house and around to the side to confront the burglar. Could he be charged with assault? He was outside the house, away from danger, but then he went to the door being broken into - he went looking for the guy rather than staying out of danger. It seems to me that a case could be made against him.
__________________ The quest for the truth is always accompanied by skepticism of anyone claiming to have found it. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the WWW |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| sounds like he did the right thing to me. good for him.
__________________ You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!! |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| I live in a suburb of Charleston, about 20 minutes from Holly Hill. That town is fairly small and rural. What I don't understand is that "Elmore was apprehended 300 yards from Littlejohn's house moments later" at 4:55am. Either the cop happened to be very near the street or Wunderlich called 911, then went outside, circled the house, and shot the intruder. But the story says he called 911 after he shot him. Perhaps Elmore collapsed from the sight of his blood and "moments" to the author of the story = 10 minutes. And actually, we are a "stand your ground" state, which is a little better than castle doctrine. Either way, if I come home from work and someone is in my house illegally, I can shoot him. There may be an argument against me if the BG runs out of my house and I shoot him in the street. Castle doctrine runs out when the BG leaves your "castle".
__________________ SC CWP NH non-res CWP NRA Member |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I wish VA would enact something similar. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| I suppose I understand this line of reasoning, however, let's remember that this is Mr. Littlejohn's home, and he has a right to be there, whether a burglar is inside or not. The burglar is the one who doesn't have the right to be there, so he deserved what he got. Quote:
__________________ Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. Benjamin Franklin |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| homeowner, intruder, police, shot |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |