Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: LCP 9 Versus Glock 27

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Yachats, Oregon
    Posts
    5

    Default LCP 9 Versus Glock 27

    Just purchased a LCP 9 and took it to the range with my Glock 27. Well, I can tell you I sure can hit the bullseye with the Glock but the LCP 9 is no where close and the pattern is not nearly as tight. Seems to shoot high and to the left. Guess I must need a lot more practice with the Ruger.





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #2
    PARA-P-14's Avatar
    PARA-P-14 is offline PARA-P-14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    KINSTON,N.C.
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Travelador View Post
    Just purchased a LCP 9 and took it to the range with my Glock 27. Well, I can tell you I sure can hit the bullseye with the Glock but the LCP 9 is no where close and the pattern is not nearly as tight. Seems to shoot high and to the left. Guess I must need a lot more practice with the Ruger.
    I HAVE TWO LC9'S AND BOTH ARE EXTREMELY ACCURATE!!!I ALSO HAVE A GLOCK 27 AND IT ALSO IS ACCURATE.THE LC9 HAS LESS RECOIL,OF COURSE IT'S 9MM VS.49S&W.I USE BOTH THE LC0 AND GLOCK AS BUG WEAPONS WITH NO PROBLEMS WITH EITHER!! YOU MIGHT WANT TO SIGHT THE WEAPON IN FOR YOURSELF EVEN THOUGH I HAVE HAD NO REASON TO TOUCH THE LC9 SIGHTS ON EITHER WEAPON.PRACTICE IS ALWAYS A GREAT SOLUTION TO MOST PROBLEMS.LCP 9 Versus Glock 27-img_7766.jpg

  4. #3
    G50AE is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,028

    Default

    Please do not type in all caps, it looks like you are SHOUTING, and is considered rude.

  5. #4
    maybejim's Avatar
    maybejim is online now Maybejim
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Kalifornia & Idaho
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PARA-P-14 View Post
    I HAVE TWO LC9'S AND BOTH ARE EXTREMELY ACCURATE!!!I ALSO HAVE A GLOCK 27 AND IT ALSO IS ACCURATE.THE LC9 HAS LESS RECOIL,OF COURSE IT'S 9MM VS.49S&W.I USE BOTH THE LC0 AND GLOCK AS BUG WEAPONS WITH NO PROBLEMS WITH EITHER!! YOU MIGHT WANT TO SIGHT THE WEAPON IN FOR YOURSELF EVEN THOUGH I HAVE HAD NO REASON TO TOUCH THE LC9 SIGHTS ON EITHER WEAPON.PRACTICE IS ALWAYS A GREAT SOLUTION TO MOST PROBLEMS.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7766.jpg 
Views:	224 
Size:	38.0 KB 
ID:	4033
    Where can I get me one of those 49 S&W guns???
    Maybejim

    Life Member NRA
    Life Member CRPA
    Life Member SASS

    What you say isn't as important as what the other person hears

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    70

    Default

    When we first got the lc9, it seemed to shoot low and to the left. We had an experienced shooter test it at a bench and he felt it was a little off too. We wrote to Ruger, they said send it in, it came back, now shoots more accurately. The instructor thought maybe the sights were off and given the better groups we're getting (and we're new to shooting), maybe that really was all it needed. Maybe you could have others shoot it and see if they have the same issue. Just a thought. I happen to really like this gun. It was my husband's but I've co-opted it.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Knox TN
    Posts
    725

    Default

    The larger or heavyer guns will almost always shoot better groups, the LC-9 is more of a close up weapon, I have a 27 and a Taurus 709, very close in size to the LC-9, with the Glock I always do well, but with the Taurus I do ok but really have to try a lot harder to get a good group

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Cal-LEFT-fornia
    Posts
    323

    Default

    I've said it before, Ruger should be ashamed of the LC9. It is junk, absolute junk. I've handled a couple of them, and they are poorly designed, sloppily machined, and functionally unreliable. You can practice with it all you want, it'll never, ever, shoot like the Glock. Stick with perfection.

  9. #8
    G50AE is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,028

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Providence Ranch View Post
    I've said it before, Ruger should be ashamed of the LC9. It is junk, absolute junk. I've handled a couple of them, and they are poorly designed, sloppily machined, and functionally unreliable. You can practice with it all you want, it'll never, ever, shoot like the Glock. Stick with perfection.
    Agreed. Get yourself a Glock.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    8

    Default

    I own an LC9. And I own a Glock. Saying the Ruger is junk because you like the Glock is kinda ridiculous. I agree that the LC9 is no Glock. But my Glock isn't a Kimber Aegis either. I have about 350 rounds through my LC9 now, it's not failed me once...I pull the trigger, it goes bang. I'm not putting them in the 10 ring at 25 yards, but it'll kill a paper plate at 5 yards every time.

    Just like anything else, different isn't necessarily better or worse. Play with it, get used to it, and see how it goes. If you decide you don't like it, dump it. If you do dump it, shoot me a message, maybe we can work out a deal. My wife doesn't care for my Glock and I'm thinking about picking up another LC9 :)

  11. #10
    G50AE is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,028

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Feuerhak View Post
    I agree that the LC9 is no Glock. But my Glock isn't a Kimber Aegis either.
    Yeah, the Glock is better than both of those options.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Facebook Comments


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •