Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: Which .44 Magnum?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    1,207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NCIC105 View Post
    Kind of looked like a gay fellow going falllaalllaaalla

    I did not watch the video until your post.....Strange!
    Haha to say the least. Who has the time to sit around and come up with stupid videos like this?





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #12
    The_Outlaw's Avatar
    The_Outlaw is offline ~The Dude Abides~
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Great State of Texas "Remember the Alamo"
    Posts
    1,063

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deserteagle View Post
    Haha to say the least. Who has the time to sit around and come up with stupid videos like this?
    LOL...I found it on YouTube and it made me chuckle. Just thought I would share it. :)
    MARK IT ZERO!
    ~Walter Sobchak~

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11

    Default .44 mag

    Just my two cents but both are nice guns. I personally like the .44mag to have a 4" barrel since I don't necessarily hunt with it but as a back up when near bear. I like the feel of the 629 in my hand and the heft of the Redhawk. Both guns are in my family but I recently picked up a Taurus M-44s/s which is growing to be my favorite. I know Taurus gets a lot of bad reviews but I own two (.44mag and Judge Public Defender) and both revolvers work flawlessly. I couldn't be happier with them. My father and brother who own S&W and Ruger seem to be shooting my Taurus more often. All great guns, maybe I lucked out with decent weapons. The Taurus is also ported and very heavy which I find a great combo for shooting hot handloads. Furthermore the Taurus new was only $460, over 1,000 magnum rounds through it without any issues.

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    253

    Default

    The Ruger will hold up better with heavy loads.

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    981

    Default

    [QUOTE=The_Outlaw;259523]This poor guy sure could have used a 44 magnum if not something bigger...Very scary stuff.

    That was kinda scary. I might have nightmares about that----falallalallallalafalallafalala
    "Those who would trade liberty for security, deserves neither liberty nor security."
    "The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson".

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    981

    Default

    Rugers are more rugged and I believe less expensive than S&W plus S&W jumped in bed with the antigun crowd back in the Clinton era not to mention some other shortcomings. They may have changed lately but I still prefer Ruger or another before S&W.

    The Dark Side of Smith & Wesson

    SMITH & WESSON BETRAYAL
    "Those who would trade liberty for security, deserves neither liberty nor security."
    "The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson".

  8. #17
    Ringo's Avatar
    Ringo is online now Politically Incorrect
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,494

    Default

    Love my Vaquero 7 1/2 inch, good balance, very accurate.
    Which .44 Magnum?-ruger-44.jpg
    ISRAEL-God's Prophetic Timepiece

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Facebook Comments


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •