Go Back   USA Carry > Location Specific Forums > Hawaii Discussion and Firearm News


Will there be a Federal CCW? or Reciprocity between all 50 states?

Will the bill that was short by two votes be reintroduced?...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2009, 11:09 PM
Glock Perfection's Avatar  

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hawaii, Honolulu
Posts: 12
Default Will there be a Federal CCW? or Reciprocity between all 50 states?

Will the bill that was short by two votes be reintroduced?
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 09-19-2009, 11:31 PM
HootmonSccy's Avatar  

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gulf Coast, Fl
Posts: 249
Default

I hope not.. I don't want anything with gun rights at the federal level.. It should be a states rights issue..
If the Feds grant it, they can take it away, make it more restrictive, etc..
__________________

Gulf Coast, Floriduh
Sccy is the limit
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2009, 01:22 AM
Glock Perfection's Avatar  

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hawaii, Honolulu
Posts: 12
Default

The problem is getting the states that don't want to grant civilians a permit because the have may issue laws, which means they won't issue a permit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2009, 01:38 AM
Stiofan's Avatar  

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Panhandle, Idaho
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HootmonSccy View Post
I hope not.. I don't want anything with gun rights at the federal level.. It should be a states rights issue..
If the Feds grant it, they can take it away, make it more restrictive, etc..
Gun rights are not a states rights issue, and the Feds are not "granting" anything.

The right to keep and bear arms is a right no state should be able to suspend (as they have been doing). Laws like this only force these states into compliance with our Constitution.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-20-2009, 01:47 AM
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho
Posts: 219
Default

Carry all over!!! Great Thought, but I'm not gonna hold my breath
__________________
Good Luck!!!
John
http://www.packing4life.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-20-2009, 08:21 AM
HootmonSccy's Avatar  

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gulf Coast, Fl
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiofan View Post
Gun rights are not a states rights issue, and the Feds are not "granting" anything.

The right to keep and bear arms is a right no state should be able to suspend (as they have been doing). Laws like this only force these states into compliance with our Constitution.
First God, then The Constitution is where the states get their rights....
The original framers wanted a small federal government with limited powers. If you leave it with the states and you live in a place where you don't like the laws, then you have the option to move to a state where you do like the laws.. If you leave it to the federal gov't, then with every swing of the election, you run the risk of loosing (re-interpretation) of your rights..
You have to overcome the big population areas (they get more congressmen) which tend to be anti gun.
If you want to leave your ability to carry to San Fran Nan and the like, that's your choice..

I say leave it with the states and I'll battle it from there..
I like most of the Laws in Florida, where I live.. If there were to become anything National, I would surely loose something in the compromise..
__________________

Gulf Coast, Floriduh
Sccy is the limit
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-20-2009, 06:15 PM
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiofan View Post
Gun rights are not a states rights issue, and the Feds are not "granting" anything.

The right to keep and bear arms is a right no state should be able to suspend (as they have been doing). Laws like this only force these states into compliance with our Constitution.
Why are you so willing to allow the Feds to force certain states into compliance with our Constitution but not all states? The bill only covered certain states and was not a bill for all Americans, in fact only a few Americans would benefit from it. Get a bill that forces ALL states to honor the Constitution for ALL Americans going.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-20-2009, 06:49 PM
Comp_sH00tEr24's Avatar  

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 146
Default

honestly I would prefer that firearms are not mentioned on capital hill until after the 2010 elections. It will just bring guns into the spot light during a time where congress and the president are only interested in taking away freedoms
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-20-2009, 10:11 PM
6shootercarry's Avatar  

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HootmonSccy View Post
I hope not.. I don't want anything with gun rights at the federal level.. It should be a states rights issue..
If the Feds grant it, they can take it away, make it more restrictive, etc..
I would love noting more than to see that happen. It would be a great day to see all 50 states uphold the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but in the same breath I believe that with the level of federal control it would get more difficult to obtain a CCW/LTC and if the political climate swings the right could be brought to vote and the law repealed. So with that said I have to agree with Hootmon... NY and CA could have a say in how, when, and where? What type of weapon I carry… No thanks… I’ll do it the old fashioned way and just keep applying for Non-res CCW/LTC for the states that I can…
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes". "Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants". -- Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2009, 01:49 AM
maybejim's Avatar
Maybejim
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kalifornia & Idaho
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiofan View Post
Gun rights are not a states rights issue, and the Feds are not "granting" anything.

The right to keep and bear arms is a right no state should be able to suspend (as they have been doing). Laws like this only force these states into compliance with our Constitution.
Hear! Hear! This is a start. True 2nd Amendment calls for Vermont/Alaska rules i.e. no license required.
__________________
Maybejim

Life Member NRA
Life Member CRPA
Life Member SASS

What you say isn't as important as what the other person hears
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ccw, federal, reciprocity, states

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association