Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > LEO Encounters


Oak Harbor, WA restaurant incident

Originally Posted by spf159753 I know open carry is a right,but is it prudent??? Concealing a firearm has it's advantages. ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-30-2009, 05:50 AM
Glock Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI & Hill AFB, UT
Posts: 1,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spf159753 View Post
I know open carry is a right,but is it prudent???
Concealing a firearm has it's advantages.
For one,it gives you the edge over the bad guys,so they don't know your armed,and it makes it harder for the bad guys to "Get the Drop on you",so to speak,if they don't know your armed.
Many cops have been killed,because of being at the wrong place at the wrong time(robbery in progress,while off duty),because they did a BAD job of concealing their firearm,so the crooks(Bad Guys) thought they were cops,and wasted them so there would be zero witness's.
I could go on,but I think you know what I mean.
Do you have any proof of this? Having been brainwashed by LEO that I work with, I used to subscribe to the same school of thought. After some research, I found that it wasn't the firearm that got the off duty LEO in trouble, but rather identifying clothing that was the culprit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spf159753 View Post
My choice,I guess.
I agree that it's a personal choice. I do understand that if one chooses to OC, they must be prepared for the possibility that they may be questioned by LEO, or experience a situation similar to what "NavyLT" did. I do concede that there's a "time and place" for example, I won't go and OC at a funeral or to the Easter sunrise service. I'm also fairly sensitive to OCing where there are a large number of children as it's more likely someone will make a "Man with a gun" call to 911. Other than that, if I'm out and about and in compliance with the law, I see no problem with OC. I find it a great opportunity to educate the public and see it as a way to show people that it's ok for law abiding citizens to carry a firearm. Think about the last time you heard of a BG committing a crime with a gun that was drawn from an OC holster.



gf
__________________
"A few well placed shots with a .22LR is a lot better than a bunch of solid misses with a .44 mag!"
Glock Armorer, NRA Pistol, Rifle, and Home Firearm Safety Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-30-2009, 06:21 AM
spf159753's Avatar  

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tacoma,WA.
Posts: 70
Default

I am from L.A. Calif. originally and just in L.A. alone there have been many cops killed because of being spotted as being cops
in off duty attire because of guns printing through their clothing. Media don't usually tell you the real story.
But I got it first hand by family members who retired from LAPD. And that's just one city.
When I was in Chicago,off duty cops didn't even try to conceal their guns very well,and they could be spotted as cops right away.
I understand your wanting to "educate" the general public,and it's your right to open carry if you want,that's your choice.
But there is that little something about being discrete,and being able to deploy your firearm in a surprise when an emergency happens,which may give you the upper hand.
That's just a thought though. I'm talking about the Tactical advantage of concealed carry,nothing else.
Sorry for any spelling errors,I'm really bad at spelling.

Last edited by spf159753; 04-30-2009 at 06:27 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-30-2009, 11:12 AM
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 121
Default

I firmly believe that most bad guys do place some value upon their own lives. That not only includes not getting shot and killed, but also means not going to federal prision for a long time over a couple of bucks. Therefore, I firmly believe that the vast majority of bg's, gang bangers, road ragers, etc. when given the choice of seeing an individual who is bold enough to carry their firearm openly for self protection or seeing another individual who apparantly does not have the means to protect themselves, that they will choose to just move on to an easier target.

I believe in this principal so firmly that I bet my life on it.

Historicaly, the element of surprise has always been an offensive tactic, while visible force has always been the defensive tactic of choice.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-29-2009, 04:36 AM
El Gato
 

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kommifornia
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock Fan View Post
Though they weren't doing anything illegal, the LEO that hassled them didn't seem to know the law (or at least didn't care).gf
Get out the popcorn, same old crap.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-30-2009, 09:42 AM
Lonewolf2810's Avatar
Glock 27 Fan
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 22
Default

This is going to be an on going issue no matter. The choice to OC or CC is a personnel choice. Just always remember if you have a CCW permit and there is an issue with you OC'ing then all you need do is cover your weapon and you will be fine as long as you are not violating any local and or state and federal laws that may be posted. Just my 2 cents on the matter.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-14-2009, 12:02 PM
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock Fan View Post
I wonder what would have happened if you didn't have a CFP. I'm getting ready for a trip to WA state and from what I understand, I can (and will have to) OC for most of my trip (won't carry in Seattle).
In a city dog park gathering I attended, someone arrived openly carrying his pistol. There were tons of dogs and kids. We were not hassled, no cops were called, and I didn't even see anyone steer clear of us.

Not everyone is instantly afraid of seeing a gun in public in Seattle. Still, it does pay to be prepared should you ever have that conversation with an officer.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-14-2009, 12:42 PM
Scarecrow's Avatar  

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 2,091
Send a message via MSN to Scarecrow
Default

glad to see that the establishment recognizes the 2A and welcomes you and your guns. too bad though that so many people automatically think "bad guy" when they see a gun.. the media sure helps with that one...
__________________
You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-15-2009, 01:35 PM
Mes0hemi's Avatar  

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Posts: 39
Default

One question I have is, Why did he hand you your military ID back and say, "Can I see some REAL ID ? The last I remember a military ID was real! I could understand if he asked if he could see an ID with your home address on it, and I am assuming that is why he wanted another form of ID.
__________________
If guns cause crime, all of mine are defective.
Ted Nugent
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-15-2009, 01:41 PM
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mes0hemi View Post
One question I have is, Why did he hand you your military ID back and say, "Can I see some REAL ID ? The last I remember a military ID was real! I could understand if he asked if he could see an ID with your home address on it, and I am assuming that is why he wanted another form of ID.
He wanted to see "real ID" in addition to the CPL, because the CPL does not have a photograph. The military ID satisfied that. If I really wanted to push my point, though, I could have refused to show him anything, including the CPL, because a CPL was not required in that circumstance, and presentation of an ID is only required, if available, during a formal detention - and a formal detention requires resonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-15-2009, 03:49 PM
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 634
Default

I don't like the idea of having to have a CWP to carry a concealed firearm but I lilke even less the idea that I am committing a sin by carrying concealed. Seems like every time someone mentions carrying CC the pro OC crowd pipes up and starts accusing them of every possible stupid action there is. Even most states have that attitude that a true gentleman doesn't carry concealed or at least that is how most states view it. I am starting to belive the brady Bunch when they talk about OC as the extension of a man's penis.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
harbor, incident, oak, restaurant

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association