
Originally Posted by
wuzfuz
I read this with mixed feelings. On the one hand, Gillibrand appears to be domewhat supportive of Gun rights. But on the other hand, she reminds me of Obama's statement that he would not want to take away the rights of hunters, when asked about the Second Amendment. We need people to see that 2A does not mean hunting or shooting at pop cans or paper targets. That 2A was left for us by the Founding Fathers to provide a mechanism for the defense of the individual, the town and the nation. If Gillibrand would be more expansive concerning 2A I could really get behind her, but for now, I am leary. Whe needs to speak out against HR 45, and reveal it for the piece of rubbish that it is. Perhaps Gillibrand going to Washington mightbe the best thing for 2A.
UPDATE: 01/23/09 05:30 hrs PT Just announced on CNN HLN, Gillibrand to replace Clinton.
yea im pretty skeptical my self i do not trust her
Let every soul be subject unto the [U.S. Constitution.] For there is no [Constitution] but of God: the [Constitution] that be [is] ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the [Constitution], resisteth the ordinance of God:American Romans Ch.13v1-7 C.Baldwin