Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: North Carolina Open and Concealed Carry Laws and Information

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Western North Carolina Mountains
    Posts
    18

    Default Links to NC Firearms Laws.

    For your review & use:

    http://www.nraila.org/statelawpdfs/NCSL.pdf

    NC Firearm Laws

    Grass Roots NC is an excellent resource

    If clicking on the above links doesn't work, then copy and paste into Browser.

    BGB





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mooresville, NC
    Posts
    65

    Default

    North Carolina is NOT a Castle Doctrine state. The General Assembly just had a meeting yesterday about whether or not to bring Castle Doctrine to NC. the proposed bill I saw stated that it would go into affect Dec of 2011

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    2,445

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aosailor View Post
    North Carolina is NOT a Castle Doctrine state. The General Assembly just had a meeting yesterday about whether or not to bring Castle Doctrine to NC. the proposed bill I saw stated that it would go into affect Dec of 2011
    What about this?

    GS_14-51.1

    § 14‑51.1. Use of deadly physical force against an intruder.
    (a) A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence is justified in using any degree of force that the occupant reasonably believes is necessary, including deadly force, against an intruder to prevent a forcible entry into the home or residence or to terminate the intruder's unlawful entry (i) if the occupant reasonably apprehends that the intruder may kill or inflict serious bodily harm to the occupant or others in the home or residence, or (ii) if the occupant reasonably believes that the intruder intends to commit a felony in the home or residence.
    (b) A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence does not have a duty to retreat from an intruder in the circumstances described in this section.
    (c) This section is not intended to repeal, expand, or limit any other defense that may exist under the common law. (1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 673, s. 1.)


    Memberships: NRA, GOA, USCCA
    Guns: Glock 26, Ruger LCP, Beretta 90-Two .40, Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact 9MM, Beretta Tomcat, Bushmaster Patrolman M4

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mooresville, NC
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lukem View Post
    What about this?

    GS_14-51.1

    § 14‑51.1. Use of deadly physical force against an intruder.
    (a) A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence is justified in using any degree of force that the occupant reasonably believes is necessary, including deadly force, against an intruder to prevent a forcible entry into the home or residence or to terminate the intruder's unlawful entry (i) if the occupant reasonably apprehends that the intruder may kill or inflict serious bodily harm to the occupant or others in the home or residence, or (ii) if the occupant reasonably believes that the intruder intends to commit a felony in the home or residence.
    (b) A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence does not have a duty to retreat from an intruder in the circumstances described in this section.
    (c) This section is not intended to repeal, expand, or limit any other defense that may exist under the common law. (1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 673, s. 1.)


    This is a "stand your ground" clause type of law. The difference between the two is that castle doctrine exempts me from civil law suites. As the law stands, even if my shooting is deemed legal, the family can still sue me for shooting their sweet, innocent, church going boy.

    Castle doctrine would protect me from such BS.

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aosailor View Post
    This is a "stand your ground" clause type of law. The difference between the two is that castle doctrine exempts me from civil law suites. As the law stands, even if my shooting is deemed legal, the family can still sue me for shooting their sweet, innocent, church going boy.

    Castle doctrine would protect me from such BS.




    Which explains my post on Page 1.
    My .38's are Special.

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default NC does away with RECIPROCITY requirements...

    http://www.ncdoj.gov/About-DOJ/Law-E...-2006-(2).aspx

    Scroll down to III C. Concealed Handgun Permit, where it reads (second paragraph):

    "North Carolina also allows out-of-state concealed handgun permittees to carry concealed handguns, pursuant to such permits, in North Carolina."

    This is HUGE. And I haven't seen it reported elsewhere...NRA, USA Carry, etc. The December 2011 revised North Carolina Firearms Laws does away with the reciprocity requirement that was still in the September 2010 NC Firearms Laws revision.

    So, as I read it, after Dec. 1, 2011 I can conceal carry in North Carolina with my Massachusetts CC permit (No restrictions, large capacity) as long as I comply with North Carolina's CC laws.

    Whaddya think?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •