
Originally Posted by
NavyLCDR
How do you figure it is an anti-gun witch hunt? We all know, on this forum, how important it is to be properly trained to carry a concealed handgun, don't we? Why wouldn't SC deny the permit to a person who didn't pass the class legitimately? Aren't the people who can't pass the class a danger to society if they are allowed to carry a concealed handgun?
If you are going to support mandatory government training, then you have to support the consequences for not obtaining the proper mandatory training, right? It's a matter of public safety, not to mention all those police officers who want to go home safe to their families at the end of the shift.
Those are things I've been told on this forum, anyway. The views expressed in this post may not reflect the views of the author.
This is in-your-face gun control. I don't support mandatory "GOVERNMENT" training. Are constitutional rights to be violated because someone isn't a good shot? That's just not a good enough reason to deny a permit. The process in SC is bad.
CERTIFICATIONS - NRA Pistol - NRA Refuse To Be A Victim - NRA Personal Protection In The Home - NRA Personal Protection Outside The Home - NRA Chief RSO - Tactical Handgun I & II - Urban Assault - Child Abduction Prevention - ISAFE - K9 Trainer