Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > Off-Topic


Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.

Originally Posted by tattedupboy I remember about two or three years ago when Congress was debating what should be done ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-11-2009, 11:51 PM
toreskha's Avatar
Hey look, it's 2009.
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
I remember about two or three years ago when Congress was debating what should be done about the southern border, how Democrats and several moderate Republicans, including John McCain, were shunning the idea of "militarizing" the border. Why? What's wrong with using the military to back up the Border Patrol if it works?
Depends on where it's being militarized. Out in the boondocks and where the gangs like to cross over is fine. We should have bases out there that concentrate on carrying out strikes on cartel assets and intercepting them.

Areas where the general public and commercial vehicles cross is another story. You don't want to scare tourists, and it looks creepy besides.
__________________
Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics
Reply With Quote


  #12  
Old 01-12-2009, 12:13 AM
maybejim's Avatar
Maybejim
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kalifornia & Idaho
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
In El Paso, the country's largest border community and one of the safest metropolitan areas in the nation, Sheriff Richard Wiles said that while he doesn't anticipate the city or county being overwhelmed by border violence he applauded the DHS plan to quickly respond if the worst should happen.
That's not the reports I'm hearing from my son who's stationed in El Paso. Large parts of the city are off limits to the military because of the spillover violence.
__________________
Maybejim

Life Member NRA
Life Member CRPA
Life Member SASS

What you say isn't as important as what the other person hears
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-12-2009, 01:54 AM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Thank God I'm alive!
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,994
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toreskha View Post
Depends on where it's being militarized. Out in the boondocks and where the gangs like to cross over is fine. We should have bases out there that concentrate on carrying out strikes on cartel assets and intercepting them.

Areas where the general public and commercial vehicles cross is another story. You don't want to scare tourists, and it looks creepy besides.
What's more important, keeping out potentially dangerous people who aren't supposed to be here anyway, or making the place look less scary for tourists? Aren't the illegals doing that all by themselves?
__________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-12-2009, 02:40 AM
toreskha's Avatar
Hey look, it's 2009.
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
What's more important, keeping out potentially dangerous people who aren't supposed to be here anyway, or making the place look less scary for tourists? Aren't the illegals doing that all by themselves?
The people who we really need to be worried about aren't crossing at major areas where there's lots of tourists and semi trucks getting weighed. They hang around the middle of nowhere, where they're less likely to be spotted by LEOs.

A while back, major cartels operating out of SA were flying up old airliners full of drugs to northwest Mexico and unloading their cargo to smugglers who would run it across the border. They use 4x4s, low-flying planes, etc and if confronted, may occasionally become violent. This may more often be the case if they've got the support of rogue army units on their side.

It's those people we need to look out for and use military force against. We should also pressure the Mexican and other Central and South American governments to allow us to actively carry out airstrikes and gunship attacks on the cartel leaders. Devastating violence is the only language those people understand.
__________________
Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-12-2009, 11:12 PM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Thank God I'm alive!
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,994
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toreskha View Post
The people who we really need to be worried about aren't crossing at major areas where there's lots of tourists and semi trucks getting weighed.
Actually a lot of them are crossing the border in plain sight, being smuggled in vehicles.
__________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-15-2009, 07:04 AM
DocBoCook's Avatar
Mjolnir, Fly!!
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 241
Default

I'm just glad after March, I will no longer be part of the Sham this is what the US Military has become over the last 5-7 years
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-15-2009, 03:37 PM
toreskha's Avatar
Hey look, it's 2009.
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
Actually a lot of them are crossing the border in plain sight, being smuggled in vehicles.
Of course, but those aren't the ones that would be best handled by the military. What value would troops add to the situation that the border patrol can't do just as well? I don't remember the last time there was a gunfight involving automatic rifles or grenades at a US border checkpoint.
__________________
Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
drug, feds, mexico, plan, spills, urge, violence

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association