Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > Off-Topic


Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.

FOXNews.com - Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S. - Local News | News Articles | National ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2009, 04:01 PM
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 5,215
Default Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.

FOXNews.com - Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S. - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News




Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.


EL PASO, Texas — If Mexican drug violence spills across the U.S. border, Homeland Security officials say they have a contingency plan to assist border areas that includes bringing in the military.

"It's a common sense extension of our continued work with our state, local, and tribal partners in securing the southwest border," DHS spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said Friday.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who described the contingency plan in an interview with The New York Times this week, said he ordered specific plans to be drawn up this summer as violence in Mexico continued to mount.

The plan includes federal homeland security agents helping local authorities and maybe even military assistance from the Department of Defense, possibly including aircraft, armored vehicles and special teams to go to areas overwhelmed with violence, authorities said.

Kudwa would not give specifics on the so-called "surge" plan, but said it does not create any new authorities.

In the last year, more than 5,000 people have been killed and police and military officials have become common targets for violent drug cartels who are fighting with each other and the government for control of lucrative drug and human smuggling routes across Mexico.

More than one-fifth of the deaths have occurred in Ciudad Juarez, the hardscrabble border city just across the Rio Grande from El Paso.

Officials in Mexico reported about 1,600 homicides in Juarez in 2007 and at least 20 people have been killed in the first nine days of this year.

To date, there has been no significant violent spillover from the drug war in Mexico, but U.S. authorities have spent a tense year watching and waiting.

In October, Hidalgo County officials issued fully automatic weapons to deputies patrolling the river in the Rio Grande Valley. Sheriff Lupe Trevino also authorized his deputies to return fire across the border if smugglers or other criminals took aim at them.

In El Paso, the country's largest border community and one of the safest metropolitan areas in the nation, Sheriff Richard Wiles said that while he doesn't anticipate the city or county being overwhelmed by border violence he applauded the DHS plan to quickly respond if the worst should happen.

"I think it's appropriate for the federal government to have a contingency plan all the way up to the worst case scenario," Wiles said.

The contingency plan was news to most border states.

"At this point, DHS has not contacted the California National Guard to bring any forces ... to support first responders, i.e. (U.S.) Border Patrol, at the border in California," California National Guard spokesman Jonathan Guibord said Friday.

He said National Guard officials in California know only "what's been publicized" about the plan, but added that state military officials routinely train and prepare to respond to any order from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or the president.

Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry, said Texas officials were briefed on the plan but were not consulted beforehand about a plan to fight Mexican drug cartels on the 2,000-mile U.S. border, more than half of which is in Texas.

Cesinger said the state has its own specific security plans for each area of the Texas border should violence from Mexico become an issue. She declined to give specifics of those plans.

Officials with New Mexico's Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management said they are in constant contact with federal Homeland Security officials but weren't aware of any specific security plan that could include Department of Defense assets.

"We haven't seen a specific operational plan for a specific region or specific threat. The use of Defense Department resources ... would have to be an extreme situation," said Tim Manning, the New Mexico Homeland Security director.

Homeland Security officials did not respond to questions about which local or state agencies were notified about the surge plan.


Again I would like to add the following quote.


"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
__________________
By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

Last edited by HK4U; 01-10-2009 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 01-10-2009, 08:51 PM
gpbarth
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
Holy crap! Iif that statement doesn't scare a U.S. citizen, then he's a fool! That was 1991, and look at where we are going under our ruler...er...president-elect. Long live the revolution!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2009, 10:15 PM
DocBoCook's Avatar
Mjolnir, Fly!!
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 241
Default

anyone willing to give up freedoms for security, deserves neither!! (it's a quote, I don't remember who)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2009, 10:26 PM
wolfhunter's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ft. Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to wolfhunter
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocBoCook View Post
anyone willing to give up freedoms for security, deserves neither!! (it's a quote, I don't remember who)
Doc, I believe it was Ben Franklin
__________________

"I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it." Clint Eastwood
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2009, 12:34 AM
DocBoCook's Avatar
Mjolnir, Fly!!
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfhunter View Post
Doc, I believe it was Ben Franklin
A great man, who told the straight truth.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2009, 02:26 AM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Thank God I'm alive!
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,994
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocBoCook View Post
anyone willing to give up freedoms for security, deserves neither!! (it's a quote, I don't remember who)
The quote is from Benjamin Franklin and you'll see it in my signature line.
__________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:30 PM
toreskha's Avatar
Hey look, it's 2009.
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,433
Default

This might be an example of the military actually being assigned to do what it's supposed to do - protecting the United States from a foreign threat, rather than noodling around in Iraq or whatever. Mercenaries and gangs from Mexico are well-equipped, funded and as we've seen are more than a match for local law enforcement.
__________________
Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:54 PM
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 5,215
Default

I would not mind them stopping mercenaries and gangs from crossing the border. Patroling and fighting in the streets of America is another matter.
__________________
By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2009, 08:21 PM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Thank God I'm alive!
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,994
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

I remember about two or three years ago when Congress was debating what should be done about the southern border, how Democrats and several moderate Republicans, including John McCain, were shunning the idea of "militarizing" the border. Why? What's wrong with using the military to back up the Border Patrol if it works?
__________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-11-2009, 08:34 PM
ricbak's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northwest Territories Oakland County Mi
Posts: 786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
.... What's wrong with using the military to back up the Border Patrol if it works?
As long as it does not turn into a Kissinger New World Order, Why not?
__________________
Semper Fi
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
drug, feds, mexico, plan, spills, urge, violence

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association