Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.

This is a discussion on Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S. within the Off-Topic forums, part of the Main Category category; FOXNews.com - Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S. - Local News | News Articles | National ...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    7,857

    Default Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.

    FOXNews.com - Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S. - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News




    Feds Plan 'Surge' if Mexico Drug Violence Spills Into U.S.


    EL PASO, Texas — If Mexican drug violence spills across the U.S. border, Homeland Security officials say they have a contingency plan to assist border areas that includes bringing in the military.

    "It's a common sense extension of our continued work with our state, local, and tribal partners in securing the southwest border," DHS spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said Friday.

    Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who described the contingency plan in an interview with The New York Times this week, said he ordered specific plans to be drawn up this summer as violence in Mexico continued to mount.

    The plan includes federal homeland security agents helping local authorities and maybe even military assistance from the Department of Defense, possibly including aircraft, armored vehicles and special teams to go to areas overwhelmed with violence, authorities said.

    Kudwa would not give specifics on the so-called "surge" plan, but said it does not create any new authorities.

    In the last year, more than 5,000 people have been killed and police and military officials have become common targets for violent drug cartels who are fighting with each other and the government for control of lucrative drug and human smuggling routes across Mexico.

    More than one-fifth of the deaths have occurred in Ciudad Juarez, the hardscrabble border city just across the Rio Grande from El Paso.

    Officials in Mexico reported about 1,600 homicides in Juarez in 2007 and at least 20 people have been killed in the first nine days of this year.

    To date, there has been no significant violent spillover from the drug war in Mexico, but U.S. authorities have spent a tense year watching and waiting.

    In October, Hidalgo County officials issued fully automatic weapons to deputies patrolling the river in the Rio Grande Valley. Sheriff Lupe Trevino also authorized his deputies to return fire across the border if smugglers or other criminals took aim at them.

    In El Paso, the country's largest border community and one of the safest metropolitan areas in the nation, Sheriff Richard Wiles said that while he doesn't anticipate the city or county being overwhelmed by border violence he applauded the DHS plan to quickly respond if the worst should happen.

    "I think it's appropriate for the federal government to have a contingency plan all the way up to the worst case scenario," Wiles said.

    The contingency plan was news to most border states.

    "At this point, DHS has not contacted the California National Guard to bring any forces ... to support first responders, i.e. (U.S.) Border Patrol, at the border in California," California National Guard spokesman Jonathan Guibord said Friday.

    He said National Guard officials in California know only "what's been publicized" about the plan, but added that state military officials routinely train and prepare to respond to any order from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or the president.

    Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry, said Texas officials were briefed on the plan but were not consulted beforehand about a plan to fight Mexican drug cartels on the 2,000-mile U.S. border, more than half of which is in Texas.

    Cesinger said the state has its own specific security plans for each area of the Texas border should violence from Mexico become an issue. She declined to give specifics of those plans.

    Officials with New Mexico's Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management said they are in constant contact with federal Homeland Security officials but weren't aware of any specific security plan that could include Department of Defense assets.

    "We haven't seen a specific operational plan for a specific region or specific threat. The use of Defense Department resources ... would have to be an extreme situation," said Tim Manning, the New Mexico Homeland Security director.

    Homeland Security officials did not respond to questions about which local or state agencies were notified about the surge plan.


    Again I would like to add the following quote.


    "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
    Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
    Last edited by HK4U; 01-10-2009 at 02:05 PM.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  2. #2
    gpbarth Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
    Holy crap! Iif that statement doesn't scare a U.S. citizen, then he's a fool! That was 1991, and look at where we are going under our ruler...er...president-elect. Long live the revolution!

  3. #3
    DocBoCook's Avatar
    DocBoCook is offline Not Negotiable, A Right
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    244

    Default

    anyone willing to give up freedoms for security, deserves neither!! (it's a quote, I don't remember who)

  4. #4
    wolfhunter Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DocBoCook View Post
    anyone willing to give up freedoms for security, deserves neither!! (it's a quote, I don't remember who)
    Doc, I believe it was Ben Franklin

  5. #5
    DocBoCook's Avatar
    DocBoCook is offline Not Negotiable, A Right
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfhunter View Post
    Doc, I believe it was Ben Franklin
    A great man, who told the straight truth.

  6. #6
    tattedupboy's Avatar
    tattedupboy is offline Thank God I'm alive!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DocBoCook View Post
    anyone willing to give up freedoms for security, deserves neither!! (it's a quote, I don't remember who)
    The quote is from Benjamin Franklin and you'll see it in my signature line.
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

  7. #7
    toreskha's Avatar
    toreskha is offline Titles are un-American.
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,437

    Default

    This might be an example of the military actually being assigned to do what it's supposed to do - protecting the United States from a foreign threat, rather than noodling around in Iraq or whatever. Mercenaries and gangs from Mexico are well-equipped, funded and as we've seen are more than a match for local law enforcement.
    Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    7,857

    Default

    I would not mind them stopping mercenaries and gangs from crossing the border. Patroling and fighting in the streets of America is another matter.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  9. #9
    tattedupboy's Avatar
    tattedupboy is offline Thank God I'm alive!
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,633

    Default

    I remember about two or three years ago when Congress was debating what should be done about the southern border, how Democrats and several moderate Republicans, including John McCain, were shunning the idea of "militarizing" the border. Why? What's wrong with using the military to back up the Border Patrol if it works?
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,856

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
    .... What's wrong with using the military to back up the Border Patrol if it works?
    As long as it does not turn into a Kissinger New World Order, Why not?
    Semper Fi

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •