| ||||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| We have had 2 confirmed cases of the H1N1 virus in the production facility where I work (1000 plus workers) I have to aadmit folks are a little freaked out by it all. Both folks were sent home and precautionary information has been distrubuted.
__________________ FESTUS IN OMNIA PARATUS |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Scary but don't take those shots festus.
__________________ By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7 |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
__________________ The quest for the truth is always accompanied by skepticism of anyone claiming to have found it. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the WWW |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Because the shots are almost as bad of a killer as the H1N1. They purportedly had something like 25 deaths last year that were directly attributable to the shots. In reality, the regular old run-of-the-mill, makes-ya-sick-as-a-dog, vanilla-flavored flu killed way more people than the Swine Flu did!
__________________ Иєш Лєяжşєşŧăŋ, Àɱєяįӄă Please check your Rights at the border... |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Just take a load of Vitamin D (5000+ IUs per day), get some sunshine (more Vitamin D), stay well rested and well hydrated. Very few people ever have serious problems after being exposed to H1N1. Don't take the shot! |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| On the shots: I've been told that those of us born before 1957(or was it '6?) were exposed to a very similar flu as small children and probably already have antibodies useful for this strain. Us older types might as well not get a shot because we have nothing to gain by taking them.
__________________ When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it. --Clarence Darrow Words to live by: Ecclesiastes 10:19 America's best Xtian: http://www.bettybowers.com/ |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Can you site your source? I looked and could not find any reference to 25 deaths. However, I did find the following article published Aug. 21, 2009, in The New York Times: "No Side Effects So Far in Trial of Swine Flu Shot" By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr. Published: August 21, 2009 There have been no serious side effects from the first set of injections of the new swine flu vaccine, federal health officials said Friday in predicting that nearly 200 million doses could be produced by year’s end. ... “There are no red flags regarding safety,” said Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is overseeing the trials. Click here for the entire article.
__________________ The quest for the truth is always accompanied by skepticism of anyone claiming to have found it. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the WWW |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
This is probably the article he was quoting. Sometimes we need to look outside for perspectives on what we are doing inside!
__________________ FESTUS IN OMNIA PARATUS |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I fear any shots the federal government pushes much more that I do the illness. Dr. Horowitz - Aids, Ebola, Vaccines, Tetrahedron.com
__________________ By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7 |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Ah ha! Thanks Festus. Hmmm, I wonder why it didn't show up for my search? Upon reading the article, I came across this paragraph: "There are concerns that there could be a repeat of what became known as the ‘1976 debacle’ in the US, where a swine flu vaccine killed 25 people – more than the virus itself." There was nothing that I read herein that claimed that there were 25 deaths from this current vaccine. As well, this is a British report. I wonder: are their standards similarto or different than our vaccine standards? The beginning of the article states: "A warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter. The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins. It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the vaccine. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal...." End quote. Other opinions may vary, but I believe that the key words here are: "could be fatal." Is it not so that any vaccine or reaction "could be fatal?" The article states that there could be a correlation. Yet, does it not hold that correlation does not necessarily equate with connection? Yes, a correlation does not necessarily mean that there is a connection. Further research may be needed for determination. Again I ask, please let's not play doctor. Everyone can make their own informed decisions with the assistance of their own medical professional. I surely wouldn't want someone's decision, especially a fatal one, on my conscience.
__________________ The quest for the truth is always accompanied by skepticism of anyone claiming to have found it. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the WWW |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| flu, swine |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |