Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Oklahoma Rifle Association sells out open carry

  1. #11
    Unfettered Might's Avatar
    Unfettered Might is offline Μολών λαβέ
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    697

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nogods View Post
    Well, there is a difference. Military training reduces the trainee to infantile status, then rebuilds the trainee into a focused fighting machine. Along the way the trainee receives a good deal of instruction about how not to shot a fellow trainee.

    If 18-year olds in civies went through the same training I'd agree they should have the same access to firearms.
    That's simply not true. I personally know a guy who is ex army and twice in the last six months, in my presence, I've seen him have negligent discharges. One was a flyer from a 9mm and the other time he almost shot himself in the foot with a .22 semi.

    Mandated training means nothing. Training by personal choice means everything.
    One must be wary of the mentality creating the problem or the law creating the crime.

    I love America and the Constitution, if you don't then get out!





  2. Concealed Carry Giveaway
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Plains
    Posts
    791

    Default

    Ultimately, this isn't about lawful, legal adults having firearms. It isn't about idiots who wish to deprive legal adults of firearms.

    This is about the corruption of the ruling faction in the Oklahoma legislature, and the corrupt, elitist friends of theirs in the ORA.

    I always thought NY and Louisiana were the most corrupt states. Now I am having my doubts.

    -Doc

    -Doc
    Last edited by Bighouse Doc; 03-24-2011 at 06:51 PM. Reason: spelling

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Plains
    Posts
    791

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nogods View Post
    Well, there is a difference. Military training reduces the trainee to infantile status, then rebuilds the trainee into a focused fighting machine. Along the way the trainee receives a good deal of instruction about how not to shot a fellow trainee.

    If 18-year olds in civies went through the same training I'd agree they should have the same access to firearms.
    What army were you in?

    That wasn't the US Army I was in!

    -Doc

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nogods View Post
    Well, there is a difference. Military training reduces the trainee to infantile status, then rebuilds the trainee into a focused fighting machine. Along the way the trainee receives a good deal of instruction about how not to shot a fellow trainee.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bighouse Doc View Post
    What army were you in?

    That wasn't the US Army I was in!

    -Doc
    Actually, that is exactly the US Army I was in in 1984.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flanmedic51 View Post
    Again, you turn it into a rights thing when it only gives the LEO more ability to enforce laws and provide public safety.
    I am not anti-cop, I am pro-Constitution.

  6. #15
    Beau's Avatar
    Beau is offline I was never here.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Eastern Colorado
    Posts
    182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeauRyker View Post
    but I have to agree with the club. If you can't allow it on a person by person basis, and you can't, I just don't think a high percentage of 18 yr old kids running around today should have a gun in their hand....much less openly carrying. Yeah, I know there are some that should be allowed. But it'd be too big of a hassle to qualify each one.
    Just don't think it'd be a good idea right now.
    That's funny. Colorado has been a permitless OC state for since I don't know when. Seems to work just fine.
    Colorado Gun Owners - COGO
    A discussion forum for Colorado Gun Owners.

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,117

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by nogods View Post
    I would have told the old girl to pucker up!!

  8. #17
    G50AE is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,028

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by NavyLT View Post
    Actually, that is exactly the US Army I was in in 1984.
    Then why aren't you called "ArmyLT"?

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G50AE View Post
    Then why aren't you called "ArmyLT"?
    I enlisted in the Navy in 1988, went to OCS and was commissioned in the Navy in 2001.

    Also, being an O-3 in the Navy, makes me a Captain in the Army, but I can't say I am a Captain, being in the Navy, because then I would be claiming to be an O-6 in the Navy!

    Now, since I've been selected to O-4, hopefully to get paid in July, I will be a Lieutenant Commander in the Navy, which eliminates some confusion because I would be a Major in the Army, but we don't have Majors in the Navy, except as the primary focus of our college degrees!

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanmedic51 View Post
    Again, you turn it into a rights thing when it only gives the LEO more ability to enforce laws and provide public safety.
    I am not anti-cop, I am pro-Constitution.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Facebook Comments


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •