Go Back   USA Carry > Main Category > Open Carry Discussion


WI open carry aquittal

Wisconsin man acquitted in open carry case. West Allis man not guilty in open carry gun case - JSOnline This ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:26 PM
elkhuntCO's Avatar
SEMPER FI
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 63
Default WI open carry aquittal

Wisconsin man acquitted in open carry case.

West Allis man not guilty in open carry gun case - JSOnline

This was all wrong from the get go. He should take the neighbor to court for invasion of his privacy. People are ridiculous and have no respect for private property anymore.

Semper Fi
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 03-15-2009, 05:54 PM
Big Gay Al's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhuntCO View Post
Wisconsin man acquitted in open carry case.

West Allis man not guilty in open carry gun case - JSOnline

This was all wrong from the get go. He should take the neighbor to court for invasion of his privacy. People are ridiculous and have no respect for private property anymore.

Semper Fi
The neighbor simply called to ask police if it was legal, it was the PD who over reacted. The link you posted doesn't contain the whole story. You have to find an older article that goes back to the day after it happened.
__________________
Big Gay Al
Coordinator Michigan Pink Pistols
Member of SAFR Board of Directors

Last edited by Big Gay Al; 03-15-2009 at 05:59 PM. Reason: additional info
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2009, 01:45 PM
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Close to Reading, PA
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhuntCO View Post
He should take the neighbor to court for invasion of his privacy. People are ridiculous and have no respect for private property anymore.
There was no invasion of privacy. He was outside in plain view, so no expectation of privacy applies. Plus, the neighbor simply called police and asked if it was legal. If my neighbor did the same thing, I wouldn't hold it against him.

The police, however, handled it horribly from the start. Guns drawn onto the property without even taking the time to figure out if the man was a threat. Considering that OC is legal where Mr. Krause was (there is no CC allowed in WI -- OC is the only legal way), there shouldn't have even been an investigation.

Regardless, they put him in jeopardy, arrested him, stole his gun, and put him through all of this turmoil because they didn't know the law. The man has a legitimate complaint, and I wouldn't be surprised if he files a lawsuit against the officers, city, and state. He probably should, just to provide a precedent.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2009, 01:57 PM
Glockster20's Avatar
Clinging to God and guns
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rayven View Post
There was no invasion of privacy. He was outside in plain view, so no expectation of privacy applies. Plus, the neighbor simply called police and asked if it was legal. If my neighbor did the same thing, I wouldn't hold it against him.

The police, however, handled it horribly from the start. Guns drawn onto the property without even taking the time to figure out if the man was a threat. Considering that OC is legal where Mr. Krause was (there is no CC allowed in WI -- OC is the only legal way), there shouldn't have even been an investigation.

Regardless, they put him in jeopardy, arrested him, stole his gun, and put him through all of this turmoil because they didn't know the law. The man has a legitimate complaint, and I wouldn't be surprised if he files a lawsuit against the officers, city, and state. He probably should, just to provide a precedent.
He absolutely should pursue a lawsuit in this case! I would!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-24-2009, 05:24 PM
Big Gay Al's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glockster20 View Post
He absolutely should pursue a lawsuit in this case! I would!
Against the government that persecuted him, absolutely!
__________________
Big Gay Al
Coordinator Michigan Pink Pistols
Member of SAFR Board of Directors
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2009, 11:47 AM
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Close to Reading, PA
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Gay Al View Post
Against the government that persecuted him, absolutely!
As well as the individual officers involved. I don't know what the law is in WI, but in my state, we have an "official oppression" statute. If an officer harasses or arrests someone who is doing something legal, and the officer should know that there is no crime, then the officer can be tried as well.

Hopefully WI has the same type of thing and the officers involved get reprimanded or disciplined in some way. At the very least, they should be retrained.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-25-2009, 12:05 PM
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 5,215
Default

Police departments need to make sure their officers know the law.
__________________
By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2009, 02:39 AM
Boomboy007's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 433
Arrow Easier than that, even.....

When I was a patrol officer, there was a book containing all of the relevant state and federal statutes in every patrol car. This first thing that I learned in the academy was, when in doubt, LOOK IT UP!

The second thing that I learned was, if after unsuccessfully trying to look it up, ASK A SUPERVISOR!

In fact, I am sure that the man arrested could probably have provided them the statute number himself.
__________________
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
aquittal, carry, open

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association