You're talking about two different acts, and inferring erroneously that one follows the other. Iran as a government knows it is not in their best interest. Iran's individual citizens do not have access to nuclear material. Did you read the material I presented? If not, then you won't view this material either.
Originally Posted by billt
Rick Steves message is that the Iranian people are just like you and me. They put their pants on one leg at a time; send their children off to school with a hug and a kiss, and generally want a prosperous and happy life. The government is to blame for all the evils in the world; they generate the propaganda; they start senseless wars; they seek to make themselves all powerful at your expense. Why don't you address your energy towards improving things? The more you argue against Ron Paul's message, the less your argument makes sense. I put one point in bold for it pertains to Romney. Money is power, and good ole' windsock Romney will continue to milk the poor and defenseless to advance his wealth. He is as corrupt as Gingrich or Obama. Ron Paul is incorruptible!
"The 2nd amendment was never intended to allow private citizens to 'keep and bear arms'. If it had, there would have been wording such as 'the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed'." -- Ken Konecki on Usenet, on 27 Jul 1992