Yes, and you stated your opinion 31 times in this single thread. In 14 of those posts you put down someone who does not fully agree with your position, and most of those you intentionally insult someone.
Originally Posted by eagleeyes
What I'm trying to say is that you gave your opinion in your first post. You are a truther, we get it. You could have left it at that, but no, anyone is an idiot that doesn't agree with you. And since no one immediately agreed with you, you had to state your position again...eventually you obviously felt that you had to insult, and once you insulted everyone that didn't agree, and some of these people gave it back, you got nastier. (I assume that is why you were temporarily banned, but it is none of my business and I don't particularly care one way or the other why they did what they did. I am an admin on several other forums and don't particularly like banning except in the most extreme cases, and I didn't see this case that extreme....but this is not my forum or website.)
And then in post #128, once everything was over and done with, you could not help but give just one more jab...if someone is not a truther, it is because they just aren't intelligent enough to be one.
And even a little bit in post #130...."i feel most intelligent people come to the conclusion it was in fact and inside job as well".
But that statement is not true. An overwhelming majority of Americans (those who actually know what 9/11 means) do not believe that 9/11 was an inside job. From the lowest to the highest intelligence levels. People ranging from those who can't tie their own shoes to structural engineers, scientists, doctors, lawyers, and probably even Indian chiefs. Just because these people do not get on truther forums and argue their position does not mean that they don't exist.
I myself may not be the sharpest pencil in the box, but I'm not the dullest either. I have an engineering background, and though it is not my forte, I have studied statics and dynamics and other relevant technology.
I personally have researched many hours on this subject. Many many hours over the past probably 9.5 years, maybe even more. Before the term "truther" was coined. Even before the truther movement hit the mainstream. Not because I wanted the American government to be the culprit (or that I didn't want them to be the culprit for that matter), but mostly because I was curious if it was possible for it to have been an inside job. As many, sight of the towers falling seemed fishy to me. Though I think my biggest question in the beginning was that the three aircraft actually hit their target the first time, being flown by horribly inexperienced pilots who were highly excited. Like a novice shooting someone with a pistol who is shooting back, it just ain't that easy.
Pretty much every thing I personally found to be plausible then has since been put in one documentary or another. As far as the falling of the two towers, their design, an exo-skeleton with central steel uprights, is probably the only type of skyscraper that would have fallen chiefly due to an internal fire, with some (but only some) damage to the exo-skeleton. It was actually a brilliant design for a building, and the possibility of being struck by small aircraft was considered, as were fires of most magnitudes at all elevations, but no one ever considered them being struck full force by huge airliners carrying in excess of 20,000 gallons of aviation fuel.
I do not believe that Osama Bin Ladin ever seriously thought that they would collapse either, though he hoped they would.
Actually, the only occurrence of the day that I am not 100% comfortable with is Flight 77. But my 10% doubt is not enough to overshadow my belief of the plausibility of the other occurrences.
Anyway, I am glad that you weren't banned permanently. There are no hard feelings here at all. Sorry, but I felt compelled to write this post, mainly because I feel the need to point out, up to this point, these statements:
just aren't true.
i'm just going to agree to disagree with your opinion and leave it at that
no hard feelings here and i'm not trying to troll either.
And if your feelings involve others being less intelligent than you/being stupid/being morons/other insults, is it really necessary to restate them?
"I don't think that a society that encourages over a million abortions a year....a society that kills out of convenience, i.e., Jack Kevorkian, can not have consequences." --Rush Limbaugh