...Lawyers for the gun industry won’t mention the Bill of Rights to the jury, if the plaintiffs don’t mention the National Rifle Association.
I fail to see how that quid-pro-quo makes sense. And, what kind of a judge would agree to limit references to the Constitution or its amendments? Have we come to the point where dealmaking is more important in a court that the facts relating to rights and law?
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam