Yes. It may reduce blood pressure & heart disease -- and, maybe, health insurance costs.
No. What's next? No desserts or fried foods? Stop regulating my life!
Not sure. It might make us healthier, will it make us happier?
This is a discussion on Should Government Regulate What Americans Eat? within the Politics forums, part of the Main Category category; Originally Posted by DocBoCook why don't they tell what TP to use, how many times I can go before I ...
It amazes me...the number of Americans that have no idea what The Constitution was meant to do for The People. I am not but a drone in the hive. I am an individual and will make my own choices. Go to Venezuela if you absolutely must regulate! There about half the population won't mind if you do.
Why can't you just stay out of other people's business? Don't be such a busy body and take care of yourself. Oh, and by the way, take a gander at the poll results.
"Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual)."
"It only stands to reason that where there's sacrifice, there's someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where there's service, there is someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master."
"Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat to man's rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims."
Plus my signature line.
The gubmint IS in my life, that doesn't mean I have to want more.
This whole thing does not anything to do with making us healther,,,,,
It has more to do with Obamacare having to foot the bill...
Sure, why not control my diet? The government is all ready shoving so much S&$t down my throat that is bad for me, it gives me a warm fuzzy knowing they will at least not be putting salt on it! :)