Texas Gives the Boot to Liberal Social Studies Bias
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Texas Gives the Boot to Liberal Social Studies Bias

This is a discussion on Texas Gives the Boot to Liberal Social Studies Bias within the Politics forums, part of the Main Category category; And that is how we do things down here in Texas. If the so called progressives don't like it I ...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    7,857

    Thumbs up Texas Gives the Boot to Liberal Social Studies Bias

    And that is how we do things down here in Texas. If the so called progressives don't like it I am sure CA will welcome them with open arms.

    Education Reporter
    NUMBER 291 THE NEWSPAPER OF EDUCATION RIGHTS APRIL 2010

    Texas Gives the Boot to Liberal Social Studies Bias
    Google Ads are provided by Google and are not selected or endorsed by Eagle Forum
    After three days of contentious meetings, Texas State Board of Education (SBOE) members gave preliminary approval to revised social studies standards they say are intended to rein in the liberal bias of teachers and academics. "We are adding balance," said Dr. Don McLeroy, leader of the conservative bloc of the board. "History has been skewed. Academia is skewed too far to the left."

    The new standards will be written next year and remain in effect for ten years. They will determine what the state's 4.8 million K-12 students are taught in government, world history, U.S. history, and economics classes from kindergarten through high school. They will also be used to develop state tests and write textbooks.

    Significant media attention has been devoted to the state's debate over social studies guidelines because decisions made there have national impact. Since Texas is the largest single purchaser of textbooks, publishers tailor them to its guidelines. Typically more than 90% of America's textbooks are based on Lone Star state curriculum, as it is too costly to produce multiple versions.

    The lengthy process of determining curriculum guidelines began with teams of teachers writing a first draft, which was then reviewed by six experts appointed by the SBOE. The expert panel then reported their findings and recommendations to the 15 board members. The board also received at least 14,000 emails and considered 17 hours of public testimony prior to the three-day meeting. Parents, teachers, civil rights groups, historians and state legislators were among those who attended the proceedings, and many testified before the board.

    The heated discussions there served as a public forum for quieter ideological skirmishes happening throughout the country. The battle line runs between defenders of traditional values who oppose what they see as politically correct historical revision and progressives who prefer secularism and emphasize prominent inclusion of minority figures. McLeroy acknowledged the conflict, saying, "Our country is divided on how we see things, and [it comes] into sharp focus, especially with history and how you present it to your children." (Austin-American Statesman, 3-11-09) Proponents of both sides were visible and vocal during the deliberations.

    The conservative caucus of the Texas legislature submitted written testimony and sent representative Ken Paxton to read it at the proceedings. The letter called on the board to resist pressure to wash the standards "clean of any references to Judeo-Christian faiths while promoting references to other religions." The letter cited a prior attempt to remove Christmas and Rosh Hashanah from guidelines and replace them with the five-day Hindu festival Diwali, a measure that was overturned by the board.

    The board also rejected the adoption of the secularist-preferred B.C.E. and C.E. (Before the Common Era and Common Era) instead of B.C. and A.D. to specify time periods before and after the birth of Christ. Board member Mavis Knight (D-Dallas) objected on the ground that the "social studies community uses B.C.E. and C.E."

    Hostilities escalated over presenting the religious beliefs of the Founding Fathers, and particularly on how the First Amendment should be taught. Knight proposed an amendment to teach students that "the Founding Fathers supported a strong wall of separation between church and state."

    Republican member Ken Mercer countered that the Founders "did not want a separation from religion, they just wanted to avoid having a national denomination . . . one religion everyone would have to follow. I think they had a different understanding of religious freedom." Other Republican board members agreed that the First Amendment was written to protect rather than prohibit the practice of religion, and Knight's motion failed. (wnd.com, 3-15-10)

    "Some board members and the non-expert ideologues they appointed to a review panel have made it clear that they want students to learn that the Founding Fathers intended America to be an explicitly Christian nation with laws based on their own narrow interpretations of the Bible," said Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, an organization whose mission is to "counter the religious right."

    Former board chairman McLeroy said the efforts of conservatives were misconstrued and mischaracterized. "I don't see anyone wanting to say this is a Christian nation or anything like that," he said. "The argument is that the principles on which (the nation) has been founded are biblically based."

    McLeroy found support for his position in the dean of the College of Humanities at the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Derek Davis. "An education without some understanding of the profound role of religion in our nation's history and its contributions to our nation's success is an incomplete education, and our courts have often said as much," said Davis. (Education Week, 1-13-10)

    The subject of minority inclusion and prominence in the guidelines was another ongoing area of controversy. Texas state legislator Eddie Rodriguez (D-Austin), representing the Mexican-American caucus, came before the board to voice concerns about the absence of important Hispanic figures and groups in the history standards. Rodriguez asked the board to include Dolores Huerta, co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America and member of the Democratic Socialists of America in the guidelines; member Pat Hardy (R- Fort Worth) informed him Huerta was already in the standards.

    Other Hispanics such as Jose Antonia Navarro were added in response to the push for greater inclusion, but tensions rose when not every request was adopted. Mary Helen Berlanga, Democrat board member, stormed out of the room when members did not add the names of two Hispanic and one black Medal of Honor recipients to a history lesson. Berlanga was also upset that the board deleted a requirement that sociology students "explain how institutional racism is evident in American society." She accused her colleagues of "whitewashing" the curriculum standards, saying, "We can just pretend this is a white America and Hispanics don't exist."

    Republican members argued that listing three Medal of Honor winners out of the thousands of those honored "diminishes the accomplishment of other recipients." Terri Leo (R-Spring) said, "I would rather give teachers the academic freedom to possibly pull a winner from that school, that those children can relate to and emulate."

    Further examples of the changes the SBOE ultimately approved include restoring references to Independence Day, Thomas Edison, Christopher Columbus, Mother Teresa, Albert Einstein, Neil Armstrong and Daniel Boone that had been deleted. The board added the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms to a lesson on the Bill of Rights, an element conspicuously absent from some curricula.

    Teachers and textbooks will be required to accurately describe the U.S. form of government as a constitutional republic rather than as a democracy. Depictions of Joseph McCarthy must include an explanation of "how the later release of the Verona papers confirmed suspicions of Communist infiltration in the U.S. government." The Verona papers are verified transcripts of communications between the Soviet Union and its agents in the U.S.

    A section in the U.S. government standards will cover the concept of American exceptionalism and detail how the nation's values are unique from other nations. Alexis de Tocqueville's five values critical to America's success as a republic will also be delineated. In economics, the board added free-market economists Milton Friedman and Friedrich von Hayek to the usual list of John Maynard Keynes, Adam Smith and Karl Marx.

    The board, whose members are elected, voted ten to five along party lines to approve the revised standards, with the Republicans prevailing over the Democrats. Conservatives held only one seat 15 years ago, but have built up to seven of the ten GOP seats on the 15-member board now. A final vote on the Texas standards is expected in May, after another public comment period. (Education Week, 3-1-10; New York Times, 3-13-10)
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  2. #2
    Ektarr's Avatar
    Ektarr is offline Dedicated Infidel
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Иєш Лєяжşєşŧăŋ
    Posts
    1,084

    Default

    About F'n time! Let's hear it for a return to reality history. Thanks, Texas!!
    NRA Life; GOA Life; CCRKBA Life; Trustee, NJCSD; F&AM: 32 & KT
    The Only Answer to a Bad Guy with a Gun - Is a Good Guy with a Gun!
    When Seconds Count...The Police are only MINUTES Away!

  3. #3
    CathyInBlue's Avatar
    CathyInBlue is offline Tool Maker
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    991

    Default

    Thank god!

    ...

    Ur... I mean, Thanks, Texas!
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

  4. #4
    theicemanmpls is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,429

    Default

    Where is the link? We can't verify this as legit.

  5. #5
    mojo Guest

    Default

    I heard about this being in the works from a friend of mine in Dallas..........bravo TX and your return to sanity!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    Remove the biasing and allow history to be taught as it is, historical data.

    Let the parents teach their children whatever political ideals they choose. I do. And I encourage my children to think as they feel not as I do and to research the details.

    This is still America folks...

    Peace...
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  7. #7
    wolfhunter Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theicemanmpls View Post
    Where is the link? We can't verify this as legit.
    Texas Gives the Boot to Liberal Social Studies Bias

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    52

    Default

    You know what folks, you are so far off base here. History is history and MUST be recorded for exactly what it is, HISTORY. We use history to learn from the mistakes of our predecessors and hopefully we will not make the same mistakes again. You cleanse of purify history to satisfy a few evangelicals or political beliefs, you will get a tainted history from which no one will learn anything. Delete the history and the future generations will not have anything to learn from.

    The Texas SBOE is getting really close to the movie"Fahrenheit 451" and that is scary.

    Both sides are moving farther and farther apart and nothing will be accomplished with this approach.

    Ken

  9. #9
    theicemanmpls is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfhunter View Post
    THE LINK YOU PROVIDED IS TAINTED. IT SHUTS DOWN MY BROWSER. WARNING, DO NOT CLICK IT.

    The writer of your article is that shoo-fly woman, another right wing entertainer. More FUD. IMO.

  10. #10
    Ektarr's Avatar
    Ektarr is offline Dedicated Infidel
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Иєш Лєяжşєşŧăŋ
    Posts
    1,084

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theicemanmpls View Post
    THE LINK YOU PROVIDED IS TAINTED. IT SHUTS DOWN MY BROWSER. WARNING, DO NOT CLICK IT.

    The writer of your article is that shoo-fly woman, another right wing entertainer. More FUD. IMO.
    ********...the link works fine for me. Besides, if it shut down your browser and you couldn't access it, how do you know WHO the author is? Personally, I think the FUD and disinformation comes from YOU.
    NRA Life; GOA Life; CCRKBA Life; Trustee, NJCSD; F&AM: 32 & KT
    The Only Answer to a Bad Guy with a Gun - Is a Good Guy with a Gun!
    When Seconds Count...The Police are only MINUTES Away!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. E-mail I received concerning Orly Taitz
    By festus in forum Politics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2010, 06:02 PM
  2. Chuck Norris for President of Texas
    By HK4U in forum Politics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-14-2009, 07:12 AM
  3. The Country of Texas
    By HK4U in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 09:24 PM
  4. 6 Texas Prisoners Set To Die In January
    By HK4U in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-12-2009, 03:15 PM
  5. Good news about Texas CHL holders
    By Brainchild in forum Texas Discussion and Firearm News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-10-2008, 08:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •