Princeton PULLED DOWN Elena Kagan's thesis
GOPUSA » Fresh Ink » Princeton PULLED DOWN Elena Kagan's thesis.....
Princeton PULLED DOWN Elena Kagan's thesis.....
user-pic
By Kay Daly May 21, 2010 6:57 AM
Bookmark and Share
The good folks over at Redstate published SCOTUS nominee Elena Kagan's thesis yesterday and in doing so, apparently rattled the ivy off of Princeton's prestigious walls, laying bare for all to see Kagan's extreme views. They are more than simply "outside the mainstream" -- a silly phrase coined by Senator Chuck Schumer when referring to Bush nominees. No, really, he had a straight face and everything!
So Princeton, like most leftist indoctrination camps,....er, I mean, universities, immediately pulled the Kagan thesis, citing copyright.
Remarkable, actually, when you think about it. Why in the world would it trouble the powers-that-be at Princeton to have Kagan's thesis available for public scrutiny? Is the red petticoat of socialism under Princeton's skirts really all that shocking to see?
Why be embarrassed about Kagan's views and try desperately to hide them? I say let your freak flag fly, Princeton, and let the sunshine in!
Or maybe, there is plaigarism? Spelling errors? A footnote misnumbered? What could be so awful that the document must be hidden away like the top secret JFK assassination papers until 2029?
And in the meantime, democrats are rushing to confirm Kagan as fast as possible,scheduling her confirmation hearing for June 28, despite some 160,000 pages of documents to review.
Just for fun, let's go back in the judicial nominations time machine and travel waaaaaaaaay back in time.......all the way to 2003!
Here's what the liberal Senators said in 2003 according to democrats.com when they were "rushed" on a nomination. Meaning they only had a couple of years to review documents for a non-SCOTUS nomination, only two measly little multi-day hearings, follow up questionnaires by the truckload, yadda, yadda. Meanwhile, Republicans can't even get a passing glance at any of Kagan's documents. For the confirmation of a lifetime appointment. To the highest court in the land.
08-Apr-03
Judicial appointments
AP reports, "Senate Democrats refused on Tuesday to clear the way for a confirmation vote on Bush 's nomination of Priscilla Owen, a conservative Texas Supreme Court justice, to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans... Republicans asked Democrats on Tuesday to agree to six or 10 more hours of debate before holding a vote. After Democrats objected to both offers, Sen. Robert Bennett (R-UT) asked 'if any number of additional hours would be sufficient.' 'There is not a number in the universe that would be sufficient,' replied Senate Democratic Whip Harry Reid of Nevada... [Tom] Daschle said Democrats needed an unspecified amount of time to make their case against Owen. 'There are very, very deep concerns,' Daschle told reporters." You go, Dems!
Right.
Read more: GOPUSA » Fresh Ink » Princeton PULLED DOWN Elena Kagan's thesis.....
By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7