Arizona Ruling Illegal?!?
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Arizona Ruling Illegal?!?

This is a discussion on Arizona Ruling Illegal?!? within the Politics forums, part of the Main Category category; Link Explosive new evidence shows ruling of AZ judge illegal In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation ...

  1. #1
    Ektarr's Avatar
    Ektarr is offline Dedicated Infidel
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Иєш Лєяжşєşŧăŋ
    Posts
    1,084

    Default Arizona Ruling Illegal?!?

    Link

    Explosive new evidence shows ruling of AZ judge illegal

    In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.

    (Daniel Bayer/CBS News via Getty Images). The inept U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder.

    The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part,

    "Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers donít read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.

    "Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:

    "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."

    In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state.

    This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.

    Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case.

    The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be accessed at the link above.

    In a related development, another explosive discovery was made by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America.

    From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."

    No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican border.

    This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.

    The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government, including waging war in its self-defense.

    This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the federal government with a vengeance.

    Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.
    NRA Life; GOA Life; CCRKBA Life; Trustee, NJCSD; F&AM: 32į & KT
    The Only Answer to a Bad Guy with a Gun - Is a Good Guy with a Gun!
    When Seconds Count...The Police are only MINUTES Away!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    149

    Default

    The incompetance of Obama/Holder is exceeded only by their arrogance. And all too often, it's impossible to determine which trait guided their actions.
    An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
    Winston Churchill

  3. #3
    CathyInBlue's Avatar
    CathyInBlue is offline Tool Maker
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    991

    Default

    I stated the last part of that article in as many words myself, but even I glossed right over the fact that only SCOTUS could hear the federal lawsuit against a state.
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Mid Michigan
    Posts
    2,590

    Default

    keep going arizona!
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  5. #5
    Ringo's Avatar
    Ringo is offline Politically Incorrect
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarecrow View Post
    keep going arizona!
    You betcha. We're just getting started!
    ~ Because They Did Not See Fit To Acknowledge God, God Gave Them Over To A Depraved Mind, To Do What Should Not Be Done ~

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Great post Ektarr and I hope it has an excellent outcome for Arizona.

Similar Threads

  1. Could Florida be the next Arizona???
    By festus in forum Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-28-2010, 09:13 AM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 11:07 AM
  3. JOE LEGAL vs. JOSE ILLEGAL
    By HK4U in forum Politics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 07:17 AM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-29-2010, 10:41 AM
  5. Joe legal VS Jose Illegal...
    By Sheldon in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-31-2009, 11:23 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •