Social Security Number Sent to me by email today. As likely a story as any other.
Let me state from the onset, I'm just the messenger and time will tell if this is TRUE OR FALSE.
Quite frankly, it seems to good to be true, but then again, what do I know.
Subject: SSN# 042-68-XXXX
An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose
Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:
Was Jean Paul Ludwig , who was born in France in 1890,
immigrated to the United States in 1924,
and was assigned SSN 042-68-XXXX
(Obama's current SSN) rec'd on or about March 1977.
Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that,
his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few
reserved for Connecticut residents.
Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state!
Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042.
None whatsoever!
Now comes the best part!
J.P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii , where he died.
Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham,
worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse,
and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death,
and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to
stop
and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S.
Citizen,
either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his
adoption
by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records until she found someone
who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr.
Ludwigs
Connecticut SSN for Obama.
Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of
Barry O's
use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding,
because they will have no way of defending Obama.
Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born"
there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN
it is a clear indication of fraud.
Let's all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists.
If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying,
deceitful,
cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in
decades
for our country and the world.
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money,
that will herald the end of the republic."
Benjamin Franklin
If you can just say "oh well; ho hum" after reading this
you get what you deserve
| |  |
True or not, it's more to the point that as sneaky as ObaMao, his handlers and his political party is, it's entirely NOT outside the realm of possibility and is very believable by most people due to the slickness of that bunch!
1)"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." -Thomas Jefferson.
2)"Imagine how gun control might be stomped if GOA or SAF had the (compromising) NRA's 4 million members!" -Me. http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/nraletter.htm
Funny, the denial by Snopes is the same old thing we keep hearing. If there was not something for Obama to hide, all the questions about him would have been answered long ago. Too much smoke for my liking.
Ludwig died in 1981 and his ss number was not the same as Obie''s. I'd say those fact kill that story.
Tuts: I was just rambling around your website and came across "The Day Will Come." I thought it was very good and you should post it on here (if you haven't already) for all to share.
nogods: I have found the facts to be whatever they want to say they are these days. Who knows, could be truth in disguise. Maybe one day we will know for sure. There are rumors that he has several more false SSNs. Part of the conspiracy theories? Gives us something to talk about.Originally Posted by nogods
What difference does it make? As I understand it the only way a President can be removed before his term is up is by impeachment. And that is not going to happen. It takes both houses of Congress to impeach him. The Republican would be happy to. The Democratic Senate will not. We are stuck with him Until the people vote him out or he finishes his second term.
That's not the way it works; impeachment takes place ONLY in the House. Bill Clinton was impeached in 1998 by the House, but the Senate did not convict him, so he was not removed. Impeachment is not removal from office. Impeachment is equivalent to being indicted; he then is tried by the Senate, and if convicted there, then and only then, he is removed.
In Clinton's situation, the Republicans in the Senate did not want to convict and, therefore, remove him from office, then have Al Gore take his place and run as the incumbant in the 2000 election so they found him not "guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors," as the Constitution requires.
Charlie
IF he finishes his second term...I will be truly scared IF suddenly, out of the blue, he will continue to have the third term.
Keep your powder dry, my friends...
"Don't let the door hit ya where the dawg shudda bit ya!"
G'day and Glock
GATEWAY SWIFT WING ST. LOUIS
Posting Permissions
38Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
