Go Back   USA Carry Forums > Subject Specific > Politics
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 09:39 AM
Cooter's Avatar
2A Defender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon
Posts: 338
Gallery: 8
Comments: 13
Default NY Senator wants to put tiny cameras on cops' guns

Sounds like an expensive investment. If the cameras were tamper proof, it might be a reasonable thing.

http://wcbstv.com/local/police.handg....2.722036.html
__________________
It's ironic, we fight for our right to bear arms for our defence, but pray we never have to use them for that.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:04 AM
PascalFleischman's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 436
Gallery: 0
Comments: 2
Default

That's absolutely ridiculous.....hours upon days upon years of black footage from the inside of the holster. Either that or it's one more thing to remember in the heat of a firefight.

HEY BRO, DID YOU TURN YOUR CAMERA ON?!
__________________
Victory rewards not the army that fires the most rounds, but who is the more accurate shot.

---Unknown

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 12:31 PM
Cooter's Avatar
2A Defender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon
Posts: 338
Gallery: 8
Comments: 13
Default

According to the site, the camera will automatically turn on within 2 seconds of the gun being unholstered
__________________
It's ironic, we fight for our right to bear arms for our defence, but pray we never have to use them for that.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:04 PM
toreskha's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 626
Gallery: 0
Comments: 0
Default

A better option would be those gun-mounted cameras that activate when the gun fires. Someone on here posted a video of it being used, and it seems to work just fine.

It almost seems like it would cause more problems than it would solve, though. It's probably better to look at the ballistic evidence than trying to second-guess from an armchair perspective whether someone did the right thing.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 03:10 PM
kwo51's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,394
Gallery: 0
Comments: 0
Default

Drawing will turn on the camera. Might be cause for new way to hold gun. The lense cover grip>>>>
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 04:13 PM
Glock Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 553
Gallery: 2
Comments: 0
Default

The problem is that the camera doesn't catch a whole lot. It won't record the footage that ocurred moments before the firearm was drawn.

Ballistic evidence would be better in figuring out what happened.




gf
__________________
A few well placed shots with a .22LR is a lot better than a bunch of solid misses with a .44 mag!


Glock 19 9mm
Glock 23 .40 S&W
Glock 27 (x3) .40 S&W
STI Edge .45 ACP
Taurus 66SS .357 Mag.
Mossberg 500 12 Gauge
Remington 860 20 Gauge
Remington 700 .308 Win.
Ruger 77 .270 Win.

Glock Armorer
NRA Pistol
NRA Rifle Instructor
NRA Home Firearm Safety Instructor
NRA Member
IALEFI Member

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:44 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aurora
Posts: 63
Gallery: 0
Comments: 0
Default

What good will this do. The camera will not show the events leading up to deployment of the gun and the LEO may get in trouble because many facts of the shooting may be missing. It may also make a LEO hestitate before deploying his firearm therefore putting him in harms way.
These polititains are way to out of touch with the real world and I can't believe we elect them and pay them to come up with this stupid s**t.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 03:41 PM
kwo51's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,394
Gallery: 0
Comments: 0
Default

Why not put a camera man in every car? Or take the guns away if you don't trust them.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:05 PM
Cooter's Avatar
2A Defender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon
Posts: 338
Gallery: 8
Comments: 13
Default

LOL...lense cover grip. Good one kwo51
__________________
It's ironic, we fight for our right to bear arms for our defence, but pray we never have to use them for that.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 08:01 PM
Brainchild's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 309
Gallery: 0
Comments: 0
Default

So,the lights can be turned off to avoid giving away the LEO's position(thereby offering no video evidence whatsoever) and it has optional audio(which is OPTIONAL,MEANING IF HE DON'T WANT IT,ABSOLUTELY NO AUDIO EVIDENCE).
Sounds like it won't solve anything,just waste taxpayer money.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
If you want peace, prepare for war.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Home - Forums - Register - Permit Reminder - Permit Info - Permit Maps - Gun Term Glossary - News - Gallery - Reviews - Calendar - Memberships - Store - Contact Us - Search - Links
More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association